2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The activation of directional stem cell motility by green light-emitting diode irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…De Villiers et al [21] Human adipose tissue 24, 48, and 72 h after irradiation The irradiated cell group had a statistically significant increase on cell proliferation at 24 and 72 h when compared to the nonirradiated group Horvat-Karajz et al [22] Murine bone marrow 24, 48, and 72 h after the first irradiation Biostimulation at lower doses in all time point evaluated and inhibition in cell growth after 48 h at higher doses (11.7 J/cm 2 ) Mvula et al [23] Human adipose tissue 24 and 48 h after irradiation Increase of cell proliferation in irradiated cells when compared to nonirradiated cells at the intervals of 24 and 48 h Ong et al [24] Human orbital fat tissues 24, 48, and 72 h after irradiation LED irradiation showed no effect on human orbital fat stem cells proliferation Soares et al [25] Human periodontal ligament 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after irradiation The dose of 1.0 J/cm 2 promoted a significant increase in cell proliferation at 48 and 72 h when compared to the control and the group that received a dose of 0.5 J/cm 2 Giannelli et al [26] Murine bone marrow 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after irradiation Cell proliferation was significantly higher at 72 h after irradiation compared to the control group Pereira et al [27] Healthy and inflamed human dental pulp 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after irradiation…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De Villiers et al [21] Human adipose tissue 24, 48, and 72 h after irradiation The irradiated cell group had a statistically significant increase on cell proliferation at 24 and 72 h when compared to the nonirradiated group Horvat-Karajz et al [22] Murine bone marrow 24, 48, and 72 h after the first irradiation Biostimulation at lower doses in all time point evaluated and inhibition in cell growth after 48 h at higher doses (11.7 J/cm 2 ) Mvula et al [23] Human adipose tissue 24 and 48 h after irradiation Increase of cell proliferation in irradiated cells when compared to nonirradiated cells at the intervals of 24 and 48 h Ong et al [24] Human orbital fat tissues 24, 48, and 72 h after irradiation LED irradiation showed no effect on human orbital fat stem cells proliferation Soares et al [25] Human periodontal ligament 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after irradiation The dose of 1.0 J/cm 2 promoted a significant increase in cell proliferation at 48 and 72 h when compared to the control and the group that received a dose of 0.5 J/cm 2 Giannelli et al [26] Murine bone marrow 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after irradiation Cell proliferation was significantly higher at 72 h after irradiation compared to the control group Pereira et al [27] Healthy and inflamed human dental pulp 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after irradiation…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Twelve studies evaluated the effect of LLLT on proliferation of stem cells from bone marrow [1-3, 9, 10, 12, 13, 22, 26, 28-30], while the adipose tissue was the source of stem cells in four studies [8,21,23,24], dental pulp in two studies [7,27], and the periodontal ligament [25] in one paper. Table 3 shows in summary form the cell types evaluated in each paper, as well as the time points used for assessment of cell proliferation and the main findings of the studies.…”
Section: Description Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…de Sousa et al 36 also demonstrated that the use of green and red LED light promoted proliferation of rat fibroblasts. But Ong et al 37 reported that 530 nm LED irradiation showed no effect on human orbital fat stem cells proliferation. It is not easy to compare the experimental results of LLLI due to the variation of experimental design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alterations in signalling molecules involved in light-mediated responses can give rise to changes in gene expression as well as in the activation of transcription factors89. The highly conserved mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family of signalling molecules are involved in the response to growth-stimulatory signals as well as to adverse conditions, such as exposure to cytotoxic and genotoxic substances and radiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%