1981
DOI: 10.1210/endo-108-6-2316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Actions of Porcine Follicular Fluid and Estradiol on Periovulatory Secretion of Gonadotropic Hormones in Rats*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the long-lasting effect on basal FSH and its time course being maximal at several hours after PFF administration indicated that PFF suppressed not only FSH release but also its Huang and Miller (1984) reported that PFF rather intensified an LH-RH mediated LH release. Rush et al (1981) reported that PFF suppressed basal LH secretion during proestrous in female rats. These inconsistent results may be partly due to differences in a potency or a purity of inhibin activity in the preparations used for the experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the same time, the long-lasting effect on basal FSH and its time course being maximal at several hours after PFF administration indicated that PFF suppressed not only FSH release but also its Huang and Miller (1984) reported that PFF rather intensified an LH-RH mediated LH release. Rush et al (1981) reported that PFF suppressed basal LH secretion during proestrous in female rats. These inconsistent results may be partly due to differences in a potency or a purity of inhibin activity in the preparations used for the experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The oestrous component of the FSH hypersecretion in RU486-treated rats was inhibited by bFF, but not affected by ADX, as occurs in the preovulatory surge of FSH on pro-oestrus afternoon (33)(34)(35). The metoestrous component showed a similar endocrine dependency to that of the secondary surge of FSH during early oestrus (25,27,34,36). Therefore, FSH secretion during oestrus and metoestrus in rats injected with RU486 in pro-oestrus cannot be considered a delayed periovulatory secretion.…”
Section: Fsh (Mg/l)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Serum FSH levels remain increased until FSH-stimulated follicles secrete enough inhibin and oestradiol which, in turn, suppress FSH secretion (10,31,32). The oestrous component of the FSH hypersecretion in RU486-treated rats was inhibited by bFF, but not affected by ADX, as occurs in the preovulatory surge of FSH on pro-oestrus afternoon (33)(34)(35). The metoestrous component showed a similar endocrine dependency to that of the secondary surge of FSH during early oestrus (25,27,34,36).…”
Section: Fsh (Mg/l)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, exogenous P administered to ovariectomized estrogen-primed rats extinguishes the ability of the hypothalamus to generate daily LH surges [26, 27]. Little [28]or no attention [16, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33]has been paid to the proestrous afternoon P action on the secretion of FSH on estrous afternoon. To our knowledge the data from the present study are the first to deal with the effects of LH-dependent progesterone secretion on proestrous afternoon on FSH secretion the following day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, PB injection blocks the LHRH-dependent LH surge and, consequently, LH-dependent ovarian endocrine events in proestrus [25, 28, 37]. However, both PB and RU prevent proestrous afternoon P inhibition of the neural stimulus controlling LHRH release the following day [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]. Thus, differences in LH and FSH secretion on estrous afternoon between RU- and PB-injected rats in proestrus must be attributable to the different ovarian hormone background from proestrus to estrus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%