1963
DOI: 10.2307/3571460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Action of Monochromatic Ultraviolet Radiation on Luminescence in Armillaria mellea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of light emission among fungi must be comparable in their previous light exposure conditions. Berliner and Brand (1962) found that UV light of 280 nm was particularly detrimental to luminescence of P. stypticus and suggested that it may involve a photolabile component ofthe luciferase system. The putative luciferin from Mycena citricolor isolated by Kuwabara and Wassink (1966) had an absorption maxima at 270 and 320 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Comparisons of light emission among fungi must be comparable in their previous light exposure conditions. Berliner and Brand (1962) found that UV light of 280 nm was particularly detrimental to luminescence of P. stypticus and suggested that it may involve a photolabile component ofthe luciferase system. The putative luciferin from Mycena citricolor isolated by Kuwabara and Wassink (1966) had an absorption maxima at 270 and 320 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diurnal periodicity of lumines? cence was observed in P. stypticus, A. mellea and M. polygramma (Berliner, 1961a;Calleja and Reynolds, 1970a). Short-wave ultraviolet light (280 nm) reversibly inhibited P. stypticus lumi?…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations