2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ACS survey of Galactic globular clusters – XIV. Bayesian single-population analysis of 69 globular clusters

Abstract: We use Hubble Space Telescope (HST) imaging from the ACS Treasury Survey to determine fits for single population isochrones of 69 Galactic globular clusters. Using robust Bayesian analysis techniques, we simultaneously determine ages, distances, absorptions, and helium values for each cluster under the scenario of a "single" stellar population on model grids with solar ratio heavy element abundances. The set of cluster parameters is determined in a consistent and reproducible manner for all clusters using the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of SSP isochrone fitting are shown in Table 3 and Figures 9 and 10. The SSP age derivation of 13.7 ± 0.5 Gyr is in good agreement with Gratton et al (2003), that obtained 13.4 ± 1.1 Gyr, and with the Bayesian technique from Wagner-Kaiser et al (2017) that resulted in an age of 13.202 +0.174 −0.152 Gyr. The parallax from Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration et al 2018b) for the NGC 6752, ω = 0.2610 ± 0.0011 mas, corrected by the zero point of −0.03 mas given by Lindegren et al (2018), gives a heliocentric distance of 3.85 ± 0.02 kpc.…”
Section: Application To the Halo Globular Cluster Ngc 6752supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of SSP isochrone fitting are shown in Table 3 and Figures 9 and 10. The SSP age derivation of 13.7 ± 0.5 Gyr is in good agreement with Gratton et al (2003), that obtained 13.4 ± 1.1 Gyr, and with the Bayesian technique from Wagner-Kaiser et al (2017) that resulted in an age of 13.202 +0.174 −0.152 Gyr. The parallax from Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration et al 2018b) for the NGC 6752, ω = 0.2610 ± 0.0011 mas, corrected by the zero point of −0.03 mas given by Lindegren et al (2018), gives a heliocentric distance of 3.85 ± 0.02 kpc.…”
Section: Application To the Halo Globular Cluster Ngc 6752supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Even though the uncertainties on the age derivation do not take into account the differences between the stellar evolutionary models, our uncertainty determinations are of the same order of magnitude as those by Monty et al (2018). Given that we did not propagate the uncertainties from the grid size of the parameter space, the uncertainties given here are the formal errors from MCMC algorithm and they are larger than the ones reported by Wagner-Kaiser et al (2017).…”
Section: Application To the Halo Globular Cluster Ngc 6752mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The formal GCs ages for 69 ACS clusters from Ref. [47] would look similar to the J18082002-5104378 line. systematic uncertainties were all under control, we plot the age for the formal uncertainty of J18082002-5104378, which is fully compatible with Planck18.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 75%
“…NGC 1851 is a moderately metal-poor globular cluster located at an R GC of 17 kpc from the Galactic centre and ∼ 7 kpc below the disk plane (Harris 1996(Harris , 2010. Wagner-Kaiser et al (2017) find a cluster age of 11.5 Gyr. Some have argued for an evolutionary connection between NGC 1851 and several other clusters (NGC 1904, NGC 2808, and NGC 2298 on the basis of their spatial proximity (Bellazzini et al 2001), as we confirm by our abundances below.…”
Section: Ngc 1851mentioning
confidence: 81%