The Acquisition of Language: Evidence in Syntax

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the two main approaches to language acquisition and present the main ideas behind the nativist and the usage-based account. The concomitant argument between the two sides has been present in linguistics ever since the proposal of innateness was provided by the paradigm of mainstream generative grammar (Chomsky 1965). In order to contribute to the ongoing discussion, we will attempt to outline the main challenges that the both theoretical strands are faced with and provide an overview of syntactic evidence provided by linguists whose work was devoted to understanding the mechanisms of language acquisition. Our goal is to analyze the insights provided by the phenomena such as syntactic bootstrapping, poverty of the stimulus, multiple argument realizations and non-canonical syntactic constructions and argue that integrating these findings into a usage-based framework (Tomasello 2000(Tomasello , 2003(Tomasello & 2009 or various instances of Construction Grammar (Goldberg 1995 & 1996, Fillmore Kay & Fillmore 1999, van Trijp 2016, Steels 2011, inter alia) provides a more plausible and comprehensive explanation of the processes responsible for language acquisition.

Pemerolehan Fonologis, Sintaksis dan Semantik Anak Usia 3-5 Tahun

“…(Friedemann & Rizzi, 2014)) menyelidiki The Acquisition of Syntax. (Proroković & Malenica, 2017)) melakukan penelitian tentang The Acquisition of Language: Evidence In Syntax; Keleş et al, (2022) mengkaji tentang pengaruh usia anak dalam pemerolehan semantik dan fonologi anak bahasa Turky. Mashaqba et al, (2022) menelaah tentang pemerolehan dan produksi konsonan /ṭ, ḍ, ṣ/ anak-anak Jordania.…”