1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(80)90393-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acoustic characteristics of duct bends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we show an example of applications of the MMM for the characterization of a particular bend, which has been already characterized by an experiment and a finite differences method calculation in the literature. 8 The geometry consists in a bend joining two semiinfinite straight ducts, as shown in Fig. 1, with f ϭ2.62 and h/R 1 ϭ8.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we show an example of applications of the MMM for the characterization of a particular bend, which has been already characterized by an experiment and a finite differences method calculation in the literature. 8 The geometry consists in a bend joining two semiinfinite straight ducts, as shown in Fig. 1, with f ϭ2.62 and h/R 1 ϭ8.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algebraic method presented in Appendix D gives similar results to our method, as expected. Experimental and numerical results of Cabelli 8 for the same geometry are also reported. The multimodal method gives results in good agreement with the experimental measurements.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low frequencies have a much lower dependence on amplitude than higher frequencies and larger amplitudes have a much more sensitive dependence on frequency, with interesting new resonances arising. Also plotted are the experimental results of Cabelli (1980). Nonlinearity may account for the discrepancy between the experimental results and the linear multimodal method, though as no amplitude was stated one cannot be certain.…”
Section: Nonlinear Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ting & Miksis 1983) which limit the applicability of the solution to, for example, slender ducts; direct computation (e.g. Cabelli 1980) limiting the physical insight; and methods based on the separation of variables. One such method, the multimodal method (MMM) – first proposed by Pagneux, Amir & Kergomard (1996) for the study of ducts of varying cross-section and subsequently generalised to two-dimensional (2-D) curved ducts (Félix & Pagneux 2001), three-dimensional (3-D) curved ducts (Félix & Pagneux 2002) and lined ducts (Bi et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%