1965
DOI: 10.1021/bi00888a013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Acetylation of Creatine Phosphokinase with ρ-Nitrophenyl Acetate*

Abstract: The reaction of p-nitrophenyl acetate with creatine phosphokinase has been reported to inhibit this enzyme (Watts, D. C., Robin, B. R., and Crook, E. M. ( 1962), Biochem J. 82, 412). In view of earlier demonstrations that this reagent inhibits chymotrypsin and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase by a specific acetylation of the active site, it was of interest to compare in detail the reaction of p-nitrophenyl acetate with creatine phosphokinase and with these other enzymes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Watts (1963) also observed that protection was associated with the increase in pK of the reacting group, inferred to be lysine, by 0.85 of a unit. Although this finding remains valid and is supported by the work of Clark & Cunningham (1965) and Jacobs & Cunningham (1968), the associated conformational change can now be seen to result predominantly from the formation of the enzyme-creatine-MgADP-anion complex; the protection brought about by transphosphorylation in a substrate equilibrium mixture would be minimal under these conditions. Jacobs & Cunningham (1968) also inferred conformational changes to explain their finding that creatine plus MgADP protected creatine kinase against trypsin digestion in excess of either substrate alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Watts (1963) also observed that protection was associated with the increase in pK of the reacting group, inferred to be lysine, by 0.85 of a unit. Although this finding remains valid and is supported by the work of Clark & Cunningham (1965) and Jacobs & Cunningham (1968), the associated conformational change can now be seen to result predominantly from the formation of the enzyme-creatine-MgADP-anion complex; the protection brought about by transphosphorylation in a substrate equilibrium mixture would be minimal under these conditions. Jacobs & Cunningham (1968) also inferred conformational changes to explain their finding that creatine plus MgADP protected creatine kinase against trypsin digestion in excess of either substrate alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Similarly, acetylation of a protein by p-nitrophenylacetate at pH 7 requires a reaction site with properties different from those encountered in normal amino acid side chains (Clark and Cunningham, 1965). Although MgATP2-and MgADPare bound rather strongly by CPK, Kd¡aa = 1 X 10-4 and 6 X 10-5, respectively, at pH 7.9 (Kuby et al, 1962).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable body of evidence (Watts et al, 1961;Kuby et al, 1962;Mahowald et al, 1962;Thomson et al, 1964) suggests that this enzyme has two essentially independent catalytic centers per molecule (mol wt 81,000), and it can be shown that the iodoacetate inhibition results from the conversion of two cysteine residues to S-carboxymethylcysteine (Mahowald et al, 1962;Watts and Rabin, 1962). Inhibition by p-nitrophenylacetate has been less well defined but can be related to the acetylation of two identical but as yet unidentified residues (Clark and Cunningham, 1965) .These reactions appear to be quite independent, since prior inhibition with iodoacetate does not affect the course of subsequent reaction with p-nitrophenylacetate (Clark and Cunningham, 1965). Watts and Rabin (1962) had previously pointed out that the rapidity and independence of pH of the iodoacetate reaction suggests an unusual reactivity of the sulfhydryl group of the protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be recalled, however, that neither optical rotatory dispersion (Kagi and Li, 1965) nor deuterium-exchange studies (Lui and Cunningham, 1966) could detect conformational change as a result of creatine binding to the MgADP--CrK complex, although this does result in additional protection against trypsin and in the appearance of a marked protection against inhibition by both iodoacetamide and p-nitrophenyl acetate (Lui and Cunningham, 1966). Furthermore, evidence has been presented for the participation of a trypsin susceptible residue, lysine, in the catalytic mechanism of the enzyme (Watts, 1963;Clark and Cunningham, 1965;Jacobs and Cunningham, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%