1951
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8707(51)90149-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of the reported ragweed pollen count as a measure of the actual pollen exposure of individuals in that community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from Fig. 2 that the community pollen count in particular cannot be interpreted much like a weather factor (Shapiro & Rooks 1951), namely, that it is pretty much the same throughout the out-of-doors in the community. Here is shown the geographical distribution of the 1972 total season count divided by the number of sample days (Fischbach 1976 b).…”
Section: Ragweed Pollen Count Distributions Total Seasoti Count Vnriamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is clear from Fig. 2 that the community pollen count in particular cannot be interpreted much like a weather factor (Shapiro & Rooks 1951), namely, that it is pretty much the same throughout the out-of-doors in the community. Here is shown the geographical distribution of the 1972 total season count divided by the number of sample days (Fischbach 1976 b).…”
Section: Ragweed Pollen Count Distributions Total Seasoti Count Vnriamentioning
confidence: 97%