2007
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000255044.05784.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Accuracy of the Oxygen Washout Technique for Functional Residual Capacity Assessment During Spontaneous Breathing

Abstract: The bias and precision of the O2 washout technique using the LUFU system were clinically acceptable when compared with FRC-He and FRC-bp for FRC assessment in spontaneously breathing volunteers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequent computer tomography scanning, considered the gold standard for quantifying lung aeration, however, could not be performed for obvious reasons [37]. Nevertheless, recently bedside FRC measurement techniques have been evaluated with acceptable accuracy and repeatability [38]. In addition, in another study changes in FRC after alveolar de- and re-recruitment could be easily assessed [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequent computer tomography scanning, considered the gold standard for quantifying lung aeration, however, could not be performed for obvious reasons [37]. Nevertheless, recently bedside FRC measurement techniques have been evaluated with acceptable accuracy and repeatability [38]. In addition, in another study changes in FRC after alveolar de- and re-recruitment could be easily assessed [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 (15.8)%] in spontaneously breathing patients. 8 10 GE Healthcare currently offers the only commercially available system for O 2 volume-based FRC measurement in patients with mechanically ventilated lungs, but it has not been evaluated in spontaneously breathing patients. Published accuracy data for the GE system only provide results for an evaluation using a passive lung model with CMV; accuracy was between 1% and 3% and precision was between 4% and 6% of the reference volume, depending on the FI O 2 step change used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas washout/washin techniques are one method [11], but are not necessarily available on most ventilators. FRC can also be measured by using chest imaging methods such as Computed Tomography (CT) scans [12] and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) scans [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%