2001
DOI: 10.1086/324766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Accuracy of the Born and Ray Approximations in Time-Distance Helioseismology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The kernels are mostly sensitive to perturbations within the first Fresnel zone. Figure 39 shows the test results for both the ray and Born approximations for a simple model of a smooth sphere in an uniform medium by comparing with precise numerical results [160]. These results show that for typical perturbations in the solar interior the Born approximation is sufficiently accurate, while the ray approximation significantly overestimates the travel times for perturbations smaller than the size of the first Fresnel zone.…”
Section: Born Approximationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The kernels are mostly sensitive to perturbations within the first Fresnel zone. Figure 39 shows the test results for both the ray and Born approximations for a simple model of a smooth sphere in an uniform medium by comparing with precise numerical results [160]. These results show that for typical perturbations in the solar interior the Born approximation is sufficiently accurate, while the ray approximation significantly overestimates the travel times for perturbations smaller than the size of the first Fresnel zone.…”
Section: Born Approximationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The development of a more accurate theory for the travel times, based on the Born approximation is currently under way [156,160,161,157,158]. One unexpected feature of the single-source travel-time kernels calculated in the Born approximation is that these kernels have zero value along the ray path (called 'banana-doughnut kernels').…”
Section: Born Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an acousticwave theory for time-distance helioseismology is under development (Birch & Kosovichev 2000;, it was argued that ray approximation could give credible inversion results with fewer computations (Birch et al 2001;Jensen et al 2001). Because of a cross-talk effect between the horizontal divergence and the vertical flows in time-distance measurement (Kosovichev & Duvall 1997), the weak vertical flows in the quiet solar regions derived from our inversions are considered less reliable than the stronger vertical velocity in active regions (Zhao & Kosovichev 2003).…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these models, the Born approximation is typically seen to be valid when travel-time shifts are a small fraction of the wave period. The validity of the Born approximation for scattering from steady soundspeed inhomogeneities has been studied extensively in the context of earth seismology and helioseismology (e.g., Fan et al 1995;Hung et al 2000;Birch et al 2001;Baig et al 2003). In these studies, it is again typical that the Born approximation is valid when travel-time shifts are small compared to the mean wave period (although it can sometimes be valid well past this limit).…”
Section: Forward Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%