1985
DOI: 10.2307/1162985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Accuracy of Teachers' Ratings of Ability: A Regression Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One measure adopted was a teacher rating of each student's potential for achievement. Support for the use of teacher ratings of ability is found in the work of and Egan and Archer (1985) who conclude that ". .…”
Section: Ability-exogenous Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One measure adopted was a teacher rating of each student's potential for achievement. Support for the use of teacher ratings of ability is found in the work of and Egan and Archer (1985) who conclude that ". .…”
Section: Ability-exogenous Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There seems to be a widespread assumption, particularly among school psychologists and educational researchers that teachers are generally poor judges of the attributes of their students, that their perceptions are often subject to bias or error (Egan and Archer, 1985;Brophy, 1983;Hoge, 1984). Hoge and Coladarci (1989) reviewed 16 studies which focus on the relationship between teachers' judgements of their students' academic performance and the students' actual performance on an achievement criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the most part, teacher judgment of student ability has been found to be a reliable estimate compared to standardized test scores (Egan & Archer, ; Hopkins et al, ; Martínez et al, ). Indeed, our own results support this assertion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across a variety of disciplines, teacher judgment of student ability has been found to be a reliable measure (Begeny, Eckert, Montarello, & Storie, ; Martínez, Stecher, & Borko, ; Perry & Meisels, ; Südkamp, Kaiser, & Möller, ); that is, teacher judgment was predictive and/or consistent with other measures of student ability. Mathematics is no exception in that teachers’ judgments have also been found to be reliable measures of students’ mathematical ability when compared to standardized or objective tests of ability (Egan & Archer, ; Hopkins, George, & Williams, ; Martínez et al, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%