2017
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Accuracy of Self-report in Rheumatic Diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MAILES study has a sound epidemiological base, a comparatively large sample of randomly selected community-dwelling men, and a high overall response rate, allowing its findings to be generalized to the broader population (Grant et al, 2014). As with most cohort studies, the key limitation of the MAILES study is its reliance on self-reported information for some lifestyle and medical factors, such as rheumatic diseases (Gill & Hill, 2017). However, De-Loyde et al (2015) reported that the use of patient self-reported questionnaires to ascertain comorbid conditions remains a valid method for health services research, as shown in the sensitivity analyses, which indicated the same conclusion for using clinically diagnosed or medication-based anxiety and depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAILES study has a sound epidemiological base, a comparatively large sample of randomly selected community-dwelling men, and a high overall response rate, allowing its findings to be generalized to the broader population (Grant et al, 2014). As with most cohort studies, the key limitation of the MAILES study is its reliance on self-reported information for some lifestyle and medical factors, such as rheumatic diseases (Gill & Hill, 2017). However, De-Loyde et al (2015) reported that the use of patient self-reported questionnaires to ascertain comorbid conditions remains a valid method for health services research, as shown in the sensitivity analyses, which indicated the same conclusion for using clinically diagnosed or medication-based anxiety and depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports of agreement between self-report of autoimmune diseases and administrative records have been mixed and differ substantially between specific conditions. [28][29][30][31] In contrast, the maternity database is more likely to capture conditions regularly screened for during pregnancy or considered more consequential in pregnancy. For example, ITP, which increases the risk of postpartum hemorrhage, may be identified and recorded during pregnancy due to full blood count testing performed as a part of routine antenatal care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAILES study has a sound epidemiological base, a comparatively large sample of randomly selected community-dwelling men and a high overall response rate, allowing its findings to be generalized to the broader population [19]. As with most cohort studies, the key limitation of the MAILES study is its reliance on self-reported information for some lifestyle and medical factors, such as rheumatic diseases [50]. However, De-Loyde et al [51] reported that the use of patient self-reported questionnaires to ascertain comorbid conditions remains a valid method for health services research, as shown in the sensitivity analyses which indicated the same conclusion for using clinically diagnosed or medication-based anxiety and depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%