The Accuracy of iPhone Applications to Monitor Environmental Noise Levels

Abstract

Objective The Control of Noise at Work Regulations came into force in Great Britain in 2005, requiring all work environments to be monitored for potentially harmful noise exposure levels. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a number of iPhone phone applications (apps) (Apple, Cupertino, CA) to accurately measure noise exposure, which may prove effective when a specialist‐calibrated sound level meter is not readily available. Methods Suitable apps were identified using the search terms noise and decibel through the App Store (Apple). Apps that were free to download and had at least one rating were included. Apps were evaluated using a calibrated pure tone sound field and a soundproof testing booth. A 3‐frequency audiogram (1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 4000 Hz) was used at 25 dB, 40 dB, 55 dB, 70 dB, and 85 dB. Linear regression was carried out to assess accuracy. Results Nine apps were tested in total, with four out of nine providing a goodness‐of‐fit coefficient (R2 value) over 0.9. The most effective app was found to be the NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) Sound Level Meter (EA LAB, Slovenia) with an R2 of 0.97. The least effective app was the Decibel Meter With Recorder (Jianhua Ming, China) with an R2 of 0.62. Conclusion This study has shown significant variation in the ability of iPhone apps (Apple) to accurately predict environmental dB levels. However, if the correct app is used, an iPhone represents a relatively reliable means of measuring noise exposure levels when a specialist calibrated sound level meter is not readily available. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 131:E59–E62, 2021

A Suitable Shape of the Suction Head for a Cleaning Process in a Factory Developed by Computational Fluid Dynamics

“…Decibel X is an application that received the highest rating in 2020. It can be used to measure the L Aeq in the range of 40-85 dB very well, with discrepancies in the range of 0.9-2.3 dB [29]. The L Aeq of frequencies in the range of 1000-4000 Hz were measured because this range is close to human listening.…”

Acoustic Environmental Conditions (Do Not?) Affect the Static Posturography Diagnostic Accuracy: A Test–Retest Reliability Study

“…The static posturography assessments were conducted 3 times considering 2 different environmental conditions (noisy and silent conditions) to analyze the influence of environmental noise on the diagnostic accuracy. The noise intensity in the room was controlled using the NIOSH Sound Level Meter (EA LAB, Slovenia) app for iOS (Apple, Cupertino, CA, USA) as demonstrated to be an acceptable and reliable method for measuring noise exposure levels (R 2 = 0.97) [ 24 ]. Two speakers located laterally and behind the participant’s position played an 8D street ambience noise during the procedure in order to avoid acoustic spatial orientation.…”

The Orexigenic Force of Olfactory Palatable Food Cues in Rats

“…All rats were initially brought to the experimental room 30 min prior to starting the recordings for acclimatization. All the recordings were carried out using the Sound Level Meter app [ 22 ] and took place early in the morning (~8:00 a.m.), to avoid the bustle of the facility, and at the same time for each cohort. After recording the baseline noise (minimum, average and maximum intensities [dB]) following introduction of an empty tube in each of the perforated balls, the latter was replaced with a PB-filled tube and the environmental noise was then recorded (minimum, average and maximum intensities [dB]) in the presence of PB odor.…”