2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of human papillomavirus vaccination status based on adult proxy recall or household immunization records for adolescent females in the United States: results from the National Immunization Survey-Teen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, as mentioned previously, we cannot be certain about the accuracy of parental report on their teen's vaccination status. While self-report of vaccination status is not the "gold standard" measurement approach, it is generally accurate and commonly used in survey research [17,18].…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as mentioned previously, we cannot be certain about the accuracy of parental report on their teen's vaccination status. While self-report of vaccination status is not the "gold standard" measurement approach, it is generally accurate and commonly used in survey research [17,18].…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The rates for completion of Ն1 dose of HPV vaccine from this study vary slightly from national, provider-verified rates for the same year, which may be the result of substantially lower participation rates for the national provider-verified data. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…19 In addition, parent-reported discussions with their child's doctor regarding HPV vaccine may be subject to recall bias; those more amenable to HPV vaccine may be more likely to remember discussing the vaccine with their child's doctor. Also, for parents who said that they did not discuss HPV vaccine with their child's doctor, we cannot tell from the data collected whether this was due to missed opportunities during a doctor visit or to not having visited the doctor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%