2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1765::aid-cncr17>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
143
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 468 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
143
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although only a small percentage of those women will develop endometrial cancer, the prevalence of risk factors and symptoms such as irregular uterine bleeding and the greater awareness for the risk factors have created a demand by women and caregivers for screening and early detection of endometrial cancer. At present there is no simple cost-effective method to screen for endometrial cancer and suspected cases are referred for endometrial biopsy or curettage [21,23]. The present data showed that regardless of the method used for collecting specimens, namely hysterectomy curettage or endometrial touch-preps, P2X 7 immunoassays could differentiate normal/benign-hyperplastic cells from atypicalhyperplastic/cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Although only a small percentage of those women will develop endometrial cancer, the prevalence of risk factors and symptoms such as irregular uterine bleeding and the greater awareness for the risk factors have created a demand by women and caregivers for screening and early detection of endometrial cancer. At present there is no simple cost-effective method to screen for endometrial cancer and suspected cases are referred for endometrial biopsy or curettage [21,23]. The present data showed that regardless of the method used for collecting specimens, namely hysterectomy curettage or endometrial touch-preps, P2X 7 immunoassays could differentiate normal/benign-hyperplastic cells from atypicalhyperplastic/cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Our findings reaffirm the need to improve the sensitivity and specificity of AH diagnoses (Soslow, 2006) and efficiently identify the rare nonatypical EH lesions that are likely to progress. Modern outpatient biopsy techniques achieve over 90% sensitivity for detecting carcinoma (Dijkhuizen et al, 2000), but better endometrial assessment (Zaino, 2000), histopathologic classifications (Mutter, 2002), and candidate molecular markers (Mutter, 2000) deserve further study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gold standard for the diagnosis of intrauterine abnormalities is diagnostic hysteroscopy combined with the histological examination of an endometrial aspiration or biopsy. However, hysteroscopy is invasive, reasonably expensive, time-consuming, and it is performed under general anaesthesia in some centres [8][9][10]. It is also associated with risks, such as uterine perforation and ascending genitourinary infection [12,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported incidence of endometrial carcinoma is 5%-17%; therefore, a thorough investigation of women with AUB is warranted [2][3][4]7,8]. Endometrial Office Biopsy (EOB) is one of the initial investigations for women with AUB who are over the age of 40 years [1,3,4,9]. However, most pathological lesions are found to be benign and are most often missed with blind sampling techniques [3,7,[10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%