2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of different modalities of perforator mapping for unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Under different CT reconstruction algorithms, doctors' diagnoses vary widely. Thus, it is essential to observe the impact of images under different CT reconstruction algorithms on benign and malignant pulmonary nodule models and doctors' diagnoses [ 20 22 ]. The image in mediastinal reconstruction is smooth, the image in bone window reconstruction is sharp, and the image in lung window reconstruction is between the two.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under different CT reconstruction algorithms, doctors' diagnoses vary widely. Thus, it is essential to observe the impact of images under different CT reconstruction algorithms on benign and malignant pulmonary nodule models and doctors' diagnoses [ 20 22 ]. The image in mediastinal reconstruction is smooth, the image in bone window reconstruction is sharp, and the image in lung window reconstruction is between the two.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 However, Kiely et al found that perforator caliber discrepancy was greater for CTA (0.22–5.4mm) than CDU (0.11mm). 21 Cina et al suggested that CDU is better at measuring the diameter corresponding to only the artery as opposed to the sum of the vein and artery. 17…”
Section: Comparison Of Us With Other Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the respective institution, several perforator detection methods are in use, with CT-or MR-angiography (CT-A, MR-A) being the gold standard that could be complemented with new techniques [5,[8][9][10][11]. Critics of these techniques describe several limitations thereof, e.g., radiation exposure (CT-A), need for an intravenous contrast agent, or imprecise transferability from a digital image rendered on a screen to the actual patient [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%