2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1354-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of blood pressure measured by arterial line and non-invasive cuff in critically ill children

Abstract: BackgroundThe accuracy of arterial lines (AL) using the flush test or stopcock test has not been described in children, nor has the difference between invasive arterial blood pressure (IABP) versus non-invasive cuff (NIBP) blood pressure.MethodsAfter ethics approval and consent, we performed the flush test and stopcock test on AL (to determine over damping, under damping, and optimal damping), and determined the difference (NIBP–IABP) in systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure (ΔSBP, ΔDBP, and ΔMAP). The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is, however, ample evidence suggesting that non-invasively measured MAP is a better indicator of invasive blood pressure than non-invasive systolic blood pressure alone (4547). While to solve this partial discrepancy is beyond the scope of this study, it has been shown recently that the difference of NIBP and invasive arterial blood pressure is clinically negligible in both adults and children with few exceptions (48,49); NIBP continues to be widely used by ICU physicians (50), and NIBP is proportional to intravascular volume during hemorrhage (12). It is furthermore readily and feasibly available to professionals of all levels of experience and causes few complications (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, ample evidence suggesting that non-invasively measured MAP is a better indicator of invasive blood pressure than non-invasive systolic blood pressure alone (4547). While to solve this partial discrepancy is beyond the scope of this study, it has been shown recently that the difference of NIBP and invasive arterial blood pressure is clinically negligible in both adults and children with few exceptions (48,49); NIBP continues to be widely used by ICU physicians (50), and NIBP is proportional to intravascular volume during hemorrhage (12). It is furthermore readily and feasibly available to professionals of all levels of experience and causes few complications (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintaining a 'normal' blood pressure (BP) and avoiding hypotension are key goals in critically-ill children [1]. Invasive arterial blood pressure (IABP) and non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure (NIBP) measurements are typically used interchangeably despite reports of bias and lack of precision [2][3][4][5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“If the gut works, use it or prepare to lose it ( 38 ).” In critically ill surgical patients, EN may have considerable advantages over PN. Compared with PN, EN is considered to improve intestinal barrier function, reduce the incidence of infection complications in critically ill patients, and maintain immune function ( 25 , 39 , 40 ). EN was identified as an independent factor associated with fistula closure ( 41 ).…”
Section: En and Ecfmentioning
confidence: 99%