2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00620-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Accuracy and Radiomics Feature Effects of Multiple U-net-Based Automatic Segmentation Models for Transvaginal Ultrasound Images of Cervical Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies using python and Pyradiomics for automatic segmentation and feature extraction demonstrated that U-net models are able to achieve a DSC around 0.88 to 0.90 in US images for cervical cancer with an average ICC around 0.99. 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies using python and Pyradiomics for automatic segmentation and feature extraction demonstrated that U-net models are able to achieve a DSC around 0.88 to 0.90 in US images for cervical cancer with an average ICC around 0.99. 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction and accuracy of these automatic segmentation models for US images had been reported in previous studies. 14,15 Feature Extraction and Model Building…”
Section: Manual and Automatic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of segmentation accuracy on the performance of radiomic features for different cancer sites and imaging modalities is a subject yet to be explored in the literature. Among research done so far, Jin et al studied the effect of automatic segmentation using multiple UNet-based architectures on the accuracy of radiomic features for transvaginal ultrasound images of cervical cancer [ 33 ]. The results of that study show the feasibility and reliability of automatic segmentation, especially with UNet-based models, for relevant radiomic studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, the bridge network is nothing but a cascade of convolution. We have fundamentally categorized the batch normalization into twelve types of variation, namely, (B1) serial cascades of convolutions [95]; (B2) convolutions with dropouts [102,134]; (B3) dropout in bridge network [80,134,138]; (B4) cascade of convolutions in serial and parallel (DAC and RMP blocks) [108,153]; (B5) bridge normalization [61,95]; (B6) flatten block [69]; (B7) atrous spatial pyramid pooling [135]; (B8) transpose convolution [137]; (B9) patch convolution and transformer [66]; (B10) inception block [97]; (B11) dense layer [114,122]; and (B12) quartent attention [82]. A set of representative examples will be discussed in section VI.…”
Section: Bridge Network and Its Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%