1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf02370156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accumulation and distribution of sodium in tomato strains differing in potassium efficiency when grown under low-K stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The modified Hoagland solutions possess 7.75 × 10 3 M ionic strength, which is about the same as the culture solution. The similarity of ionic strengths between these two solutions makes constant solution phase AR k levels in the sand-zeolite culture system possible• Experimental results supported the assumption that counterions of zeolite IE-96 can be ~ AR k 5.88 x 10 -3 converted into designed K concentration ratios, and Na-ions can be minimized• At the end of percolation, an average Na concentration in the effluent solution was 22.2/zM which is closed to the Na concentration from uncontrolled sources of 14/~M (Figdore et al, 1987). Whether the small cage of zeolite still contains Na-ions was not determined in this experiment• Column replacement was an effective procedure for zeolite counterion alterations because equilibrium was established between zeolite and influent solution• In addition, there was no mechanical breakdown of zeolite, and effluent solutions were easily monitored•…”
Section: Zeolite Counterion Alterationsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modified Hoagland solutions possess 7.75 × 10 3 M ionic strength, which is about the same as the culture solution. The similarity of ionic strengths between these two solutions makes constant solution phase AR k levels in the sand-zeolite culture system possible• Experimental results supported the assumption that counterions of zeolite IE-96 can be ~ AR k 5.88 x 10 -3 converted into designed K concentration ratios, and Na-ions can be minimized• At the end of percolation, an average Na concentration in the effluent solution was 22.2/zM which is closed to the Na concentration from uncontrolled sources of 14/~M (Figdore et al, 1987). Whether the small cage of zeolite still contains Na-ions was not determined in this experiment• Column replacement was an effective procedure for zeolite counterion alterations because equilibrium was established between zeolite and influent solution• In addition, there was no mechanical breakdown of zeolite, and effluent solutions were easily monitored•…”
Section: Zeolite Counterion Alterationsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Tomato strains differ in their capacity to substitute Na for K when grown at low-K stress (Figdore et al, 1987). A culture system used for studying such plants efficient in K acquisition should minimize Na sources.…”
Section: Zeolite Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four indeterminate-tomato strains previously identified as efficient in K absorption, but differing in K-use efficiency were used in this study (Chen and Gabehnan, 1995;Makmuretal., 1978;Figdore etal., 1987 (Figdore et al, 1987) under low-K stress. Therefore, Na was experimentally excluded from this investigation to avoid any interference with K. A hydroponic culture system with a continuous flow of nutrient solution was set up.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Growth Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the importance ofK to tomato has been extensively studied (Chen and Gabehnan, 1995;Figdoreetal., 1989;Makmuretal., 1978;Rush and Epstein, 1981;Wakhloo, 1980;Widders and Lorenz, 1979). Among the studies, a strong emphasis has been placed on the variation of tomato germplasm in K requirements; several types of efficient variants have been isolated, some of which include Kabsorption (Chen and Gabehnan, 1995), K-use (Makmur et al, 1978), and sodium (Na) substitution (Figdore et al, 1987(Figdore et al, ,1989.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Smith, 1974), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) (Besford, 1978;Figdore et al, 1987), cotton (Gossypium spp.) (Balaguru and Khanna, 1982), and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) (Moraghan, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%