1992
DOI: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ACCP-SCCM Consensus Conference on Sepsis and Organ Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
411
2
38

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 645 publications
(455 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
411
2
38
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial clinical manifestation and Pitt bacteremia scores were defined as described elsewhere. 8,9 Identification and susceptibility testing of clinical isolates was performed using the MicroScan (Dade Behring, Newark, DE, USA) system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial clinical manifestation and Pitt bacteremia scores were defined as described elsewhere. 8,9 Identification and susceptibility testing of clinical isolates was performed using the MicroScan (Dade Behring, Newark, DE, USA) system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiratory failure was defined as the requirement for mechanical ventilation beyond 24 h after surgery. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure were as defined by Bone et al (1992). Sepsis required evidence of SIRS with microbiological evidence of infection, and the diagnosis of pneumonia required either positive sputum cultures or a clear clinical and radiographic evidence of consolidation.…”
Section: Clinical and Radiological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Quartin and colleagues, however, showed that risk of mortality remained higher for up to five years after sepsis, even compared with carefully matched controls in hospital with similar burden of comorbidity at baseline 10. Quartin and colleagues, however, assessed patients admitted to hospital in the mid-1980s—before the development of a consensus definition for sepsis11 and before widespread improvements in recognition and treatment of sepsis2 3 4 5—and were able to account for only a limited number of potential confounders. Because of the limitations of existing literature, experts have recently called for additional epidemiological studies of late mortality attributable to sepsis that use patient level data to deal with confounding 12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We looked at patients with sepsis compared with three control groups: adults not currently in hospital, patients in hospital with non-sepsis infection, and patients in hospital with an acute sterile inflammatory process. These comparisons allowed us to determine the excess mortality associated with sepsis (including that associated with admission to hospital) and the incremental excess mortality associated with sepsis, beyond what is associated with admission for the two cardinal features of sepsis11 13 14: infection (by comparing sepsis with inflammatory conditions not caused by infection) and inflammation (by comparing sepsis with infections without evidence of inflammatory storm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%