1997
DOI: 10.1108/eb028735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Accounting Variable and Stock Price Determination

Abstract: Several tests have been conducted to determine which valuation model best fits stock price data. Given very little success, those studies suggest the need for a clear understanding of the market process of stock price determination. This paper advances the concepts of product costing and product pricing, which pertain to financial accounting valuation and the stock market price determination, respectively. This research effort presents a workable hypothesis of stock price determination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies which found economic-based measures to be more useful rather than accounting-based variables included studies by Stewart (1991Stewart ( , 1994, Stern (1993), Milunovich and Tsuei (1996), O'Byrne (1996), Bacidore et al (1997), Dodd (1997, 2001), Hall (1999), Worthington and West (2004), Chmelikova (2008) and Lee and Kim (2009). By contrast, studies by Biddle et al (1997), Salvaiy (1997), Bao and Bao (1998), De Villiers and Auret (1998), De Wet (2005, Ismail (2006), Maditinos et al (2006Maditinos et al ( , 2009, Kyriazis and Anastassis (2007), Erasmus (2008), Kumar and Sharma (2011), Arabsalehi and Mahmoodi (2012), Abdoli et al (2012), Mollah et al (2012), Hall (2013) and Alloy Niresh and Alfred (2014) found that accounting-based variables performed better in explaining shareholder value creation than economic-based measures. It falls beyond the scope of this study to discuss the results of the abovementioned studies in more detail, but it is important to point out that the inconsistencies of their results may lead managers, investors, shareholders and researchers to ask the following questions:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies which found economic-based measures to be more useful rather than accounting-based variables included studies by Stewart (1991Stewart ( , 1994, Stern (1993), Milunovich and Tsuei (1996), O'Byrne (1996), Bacidore et al (1997), Dodd (1997, 2001), Hall (1999), Worthington and West (2004), Chmelikova (2008) and Lee and Kim (2009). By contrast, studies by Biddle et al (1997), Salvaiy (1997), Bao and Bao (1998), De Villiers and Auret (1998), De Wet (2005, Ismail (2006), Maditinos et al (2006Maditinos et al ( , 2009, Kyriazis and Anastassis (2007), Erasmus (2008), Kumar and Sharma (2011), Arabsalehi and Mahmoodi (2012), Abdoli et al (2012), Mollah et al (2012), Hall (2013) and Alloy Niresh and Alfred (2014) found that accounting-based variables performed better in explaining shareholder value creation than economic-based measures. It falls beyond the scope of this study to discuss the results of the abovementioned studies in more detail, but it is important to point out that the inconsistencies of their results may lead managers, investors, shareholders and researchers to ask the following questions:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the data necessary for the measurement of business performance is obtained. (Salvaiy, 1998).…”
Section: Financial Reporting and Its Importance In Businessesmentioning
confidence: 99%