Abstract:This study reports results on a comparison of the enabling legislation of all nine auditorsgeneral of Australia from a public sector accountability and auditor independence perspective.
“…It is paramount in ensuring that the credibility and reputation of legislative auditors is maintained in the public eye” (: 1–2). Additional examples of this tenet can be found in other jurisdictions across the globe, such as in De Martinis and Clark's () work.…”
While it is often claimed that the efficacy of accountability officers depends on their independence, the issue of “independence” is fraught with ambiguity: who needs to be independent from whom? This article considers the relationship between independence and accountability from both public and private legal perspectives. We identify three areas for improvement in public sector ethics. First, avenues for civil recovery following misconduct by public officials should be explored. Second, accountability offices should encourage whistleblowing as a means to bring potentially significant cases forward. Third, the tenets underpinning the usefulness of independent directors on corporate boards should be used to assist in defining the role of accountability officers.
“…It is paramount in ensuring that the credibility and reputation of legislative auditors is maintained in the public eye” (: 1–2). Additional examples of this tenet can be found in other jurisdictions across the globe, such as in De Martinis and Clark's () work.…”
While it is often claimed that the efficacy of accountability officers depends on their independence, the issue of “independence” is fraught with ambiguity: who needs to be independent from whom? This article considers the relationship between independence and accountability from both public and private legal perspectives. We identify three areas for improvement in public sector ethics. First, avenues for civil recovery following misconduct by public officials should be explored. Second, accountability offices should encourage whistleblowing as a means to bring potentially significant cases forward. Third, the tenets underpinning the usefulness of independent directors on corporate boards should be used to assist in defining the role of accountability officers.
“…Comparisons of the various enabling legislative frameworks provided rich sources of data for researchers interested in issues of government accountability. For example, in the light of the Commonwealth Joint Committee on Public Accounts reports (, ), de Martinis and Clark (, p. 26) compared the enabling legislation of Australian auditors‐general to highlight the extent to which the legislation provided ‘the necessary platform for maintaining public sector accountability and supporting key requisites related to independence, mandate, and funding’. Coghill (, p. 15) studied the relationships of the relevant auditors‐general with the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia and the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly, finding that the office ‘operates in a governance environment in which interconnectedness, interdependence and interaction are key factors affecting outcomes’.…”
Section: Theme Iii: Modern Contextual Analysismentioning
The introduction of an independent public sector audit function was a critical element in the nineteenth century constitutional reforms of parliamentary and government accountability and created an essential precedent for current practice. By examining the extent of scholarly research on public sector audit history, findings reveal considerable research examined the teleological development of public sector audit and the modern history in a New Public Management context. However, there has been very little published regarding the complex rationales around the origins, development and importance of independent public sector audit notwithstanding that without an appreciation of these precedents it becomes very difficult to protect the Westminster-based system of democratic government.
“…Outside of the academy, over the past quarter century, independent government auditors have also taken a keen interest in examining the delivery of transportation infrastructure projects. Independent auditors are a feature of many democratic governments and derive their authority and independence through enabling legislation that positions them as officers of Parliament or Congress rather than answerable to the government in office (Martinis and Clark 2003). To this end, unlike their academic colleagues, independent government auditors have a unique position as insiders within the governing process.…”
Section: Matti Siemiatyckimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent auditors are a feature of many democratic governments and derive their authority and independence through enabling legislation that positions them as officers of Parliament or Congress rather than answerable to the government in office (Martinis and Clark 2003). Independent auditors are a feature of many democratic governments and derive their authority and independence through enabling legislation that positions them as officers of Parliament or Congress rather than answerable to the government in office (Martinis and Clark 2003).…”
How common are cost overruns during the delivery of transportation infrastructure projects such as roads, bridges, and public transit facilities, and what explains their occurrence? This article compares the findings of studies by academics and independent government auditors, two groups that have different mandates, objectives, and access to data. There is a high level of consistency in the finding that transportation projects regularly experience escalating costs. Yet there are sharp divergences between the technical and managerial explanations prioritized by the auditors and the political, economic, and psychological explanations prioritized in much of the academic literature. The differences in explanations point to diverse remedies for the challenge of cost overruns.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.