2022
DOI: 10.1080/0144929x.2022.2146534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acceptance process of smart homes by users: a statistical meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another unique complement to these presented results is the meta-analysis completed by Nascimento et al [136]. They emphasized the increasing affordability of smart home technologies, the lack of understanding of the factors that drive their continued use, and the impact that the adoption of smart appliances and services in the domestic setting has on users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another unique complement to these presented results is the meta-analysis completed by Nascimento et al [136]. They emphasized the increasing affordability of smart home technologies, the lack of understanding of the factors that drive their continued use, and the impact that the adoption of smart appliances and services in the domestic setting has on users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…They emphasized the increasing affordability of smart home technologies, the lack of understanding of the factors that drive their continued use, and the impact that the adoption of smart appliances and services in the domestic setting has on users. We describe the use of advanced technologies in smart homes, but Nascimento et al [136] revealed a lack of knowledge of the elements influencing user acceptance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the HM construct represents user pleasure in using the technology (Gao et al , 2015), the previous estimations considered in the meta-analysis did not converge. Despite the nonsignificant HM > BI relation, recent literature emphasizes the importance of embodying features in technological devices to engage users (Nascimento et al , 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding, the literature does not indicate a consensus regarding the effect of many constructs on m-health acceptance technologies (Piotrowicz, 2017). Moreover, specific contexts, small samples or sampling limitations harm the objective of consolidating trends in estimating technology acceptance models (TAMs) (Reeder and David, 2016; Gumz and Fettermann, 2021; Nascimento et al , 2022). The divergence among estimation of acceptance of m-health technologies is numerous in the literature (Brewster et al , 2014; Hennemann et al , 2016; Sadoughi et al , 2020; Väisänen et al , 2015; Yaraborough and Smith, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology acceptance models have been widely applied to understand user behavior toward various solutions. For example, we have its application in studies on applications and information systems for agricultural activities [48,49], virtual reality systems [50], home devices [24,51,52], autonomous cars, [53], safety systems for construction workers [54], learning environments or e-learning [55,56], e-shopping [57], e-services [58], digital content marketing for tourism [59], mobile payments [60], the visual design of wearables [61], and wearable locating systems [62], among others. The number of new e-health technologies has increased the use of technology acceptance models to improve the comprehension of the factors that affect the user's acceptance of m-health technologies [63][64][65].…”
Section: Acceptance Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%