2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.949393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acceptability, adoption, and feasibility of a music application developed using participatory design for home-dwelling persons with dementia and their caregivers. The “Alight” app in the LIVE@Home.Path trial

Abstract: BackgroundMusic interventions for persons with dementia can improve health and interaction with caregivers, yet the reach is often restricted to institutions. We describe the participatory design process of a prototype music application for patients affiliated with a gerontopsychiatric hospital and evaluate the acceptability, adoption, and feasibility of use for dyads of home-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers.MethodsThe application “Alight” was developed following an iterative, exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most papers (26/31, 84%) described more than 1 type of activity. In addition to group activities, many conducted interviews [ 37 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 55 , 56 , 65 , 66 , 81 , 82 ], observations [ 54 , 57 , 62 , 65 , 81 , 82 ], or surveys or questionnaires [ 37 , 54 , 65 , 80 , 82 , 83 ]. A total of 19% (6/31) of the studies set up steering groups that were regularly involved in the research process, described variously as a research development group [ 53 ], living experience expert reference group [ 17 ], steering group [ 51 , 66 , 71 ], and patient advisory board [ 76 , 77 ], although details were minimal or absent about what this entailed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most papers (26/31, 84%) described more than 1 type of activity. In addition to group activities, many conducted interviews [ 37 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 55 , 56 , 65 , 66 , 81 , 82 ], observations [ 54 , 57 , 62 , 65 , 81 , 82 ], or surveys or questionnaires [ 37 , 54 , 65 , 80 , 82 , 83 ]. A total of 19% (6/31) of the studies set up steering groups that were regularly involved in the research process, described variously as a research development group [ 53 ], living experience expert reference group [ 17 ], steering group [ 51 , 66 , 71 ], and patient advisory board [ 76 , 77 ], although details were minimal or absent about what this entailed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers’ time pressures—co-design or other involvement activities as time-consuming processes that can be difficult to manage alongside the time pressures of a research study [ 75 , 81 , 83 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more specialized services, such as geropsychiatry, Berge et al. ( 50 ) described in 2022 the prototype of the Alight application, which includes a musical intervention designed for the “dementia patient” and their “caregiver” dyad. The prototype of the application offers a “digital session” lasting 15–20 minutes, consisting of personalized music accompanied by custom-added images or films, aimed at stimulating musical memory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine usability and acceptability, results were compared to a priori benchmarks selected based on comparable studies: ≥80% of Veterans use the pet often or daily 18 , 22 , 24 and ≥80% of caregivers would recommend a social robot pet to others and would encourage continued use of the pet by the Veteran. 18 , 21 Prior studies have not examined frequency of caregiver reminders/prompts as a component of usability, thus a pre-defined benchmark was not selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%