2003
DOI: 10.1207/s15327728jmme1803&4_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Academy and Cyberspace Ethics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumers are often unaware that advertisers are using computer technology to remove unwanted traits from models until allegations or examples of digital alterations are made public (Huang, 2001;Kittross & Gordon, 2003). Although critics often complain that computer-generated images are deceptive and unethical, research that examines the assumption of consumer indifference to skin tone manipulation in print ads is scarce.…”
Section: Summary and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Consumers are often unaware that advertisers are using computer technology to remove unwanted traits from models until allegations or examples of digital alterations are made public (Huang, 2001;Kittross & Gordon, 2003). Although critics often complain that computer-generated images are deceptive and unethical, research that examines the assumption of consumer indifference to skin tone manipulation in print ads is scarce.…”
Section: Summary and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some industry executives believe that the prevalence of digital manipulation in advertising is a troubling trend (Moore, 2007). Advertising critics have called for warning labels on computer-generated images (Bawdon, 2007;Kittross & Gordon, 2003;Groskop, 2011). Others have suggested that the decision making process of companies using computer-generated images should be questioned (Harris, 1991) and that the limited presentations of ethnic models' skin tones should be rejected (Lueck, 2004).…”
Section: Summary and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations