2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpur.2015.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The abstract Lewy–Stampacchia inequality and applications

Abstract: We prove an abstract and general version of the Lewy-Stampacchia inequality. We then show how to reproduce more classical versions of it and, more importantly, how it can be used in conjunction with Laplacian comparison estimates to produce large class of functions with bounded Laplacian on spaces with a lower bound on the Ricci curvature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, here is a natural question towards a weak form of transitivity: is it true that, for any probability measures µ 0 , µ 1 absolutely continuous and with bounded densities with respect to m, we can find a Sobolev vector field such that, calling F its regular Lagrangian flow at a fixed time, it holds F ♯ µ 0 = µ 1 ? In subsection 3.2 below, we will see how the Lewy-Stampacchia inequality, proved in this abstract framework by Gigli-Mosconi in [GM15], allows to give an (almost) affirmative answer to this question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this regard, here is a natural question towards a weak form of transitivity: is it true that, for any probability measures µ 0 , µ 1 absolutely continuous and with bounded densities with respect to m, we can find a Sobolev vector field such that, calling F its regular Lagrangian flow at a fixed time, it holds F ♯ µ 0 = µ 1 ? In subsection 3.2 below, we will see how the Lewy-Stampacchia inequality, proved in this abstract framework by Gigli-Mosconi in [GM15], allows to give an (almost) affirmative answer to this question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is the generalization of the Lewy-Stampacchia inequality. An abstract proof, valid in a much more general setting, can be found in Gigli and Mosconi [9]. The assumption of our theorem, that f ∈ BV (I), implies that F ′′ = f ′ is a signed measure.…”
Section: Proof and Applications Of The Fundamental Estimatementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The proof can be obtained following verbatim the arguments given in Lemma 3.1 of [33] (inspired by [4], see also [18] for an alternative approach): there the authors are interested in cut-off functions such that χ ≡ 1 on B R (x) and supp( χ ) ⊂ B 2R (x): for this reason they fix R > 0 and then claim that for all x ∈ X and 0 < r < R there exists a cut-off function χ satisfying (i), (ii) and (2.7) with C, C ′ also depending on R. However, as far as one is concerned with cut-off functions χ where the distance between { χ = 0} and { χ = 1} is always equal to 1, the proof of [33] in the case R = 1 applies and does not affect (2.7).…”
Section: Analysis and Optimal Transport In Rcd Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%