2016
DOI: 10.1111/jpcu.12404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Absent Presence of Virginia Woolf: Queering Downton Abbey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while studies focusing on the spatiality and discourses of material landscapes innumerably address the individual, few works connect the individual – the embodied scale of biography – with the spectral or absent, especially in terms of memory work and the production of (national) identities. Nesbitt (2017), for instance, initiates a necessary discussion on the absent presences of individuals’ multiple and complex identities in the context of the nation by drawing from queer theory to deconstruct the memorialisation and absence of Oscar Wilde and Virginia Woolf in Downton Abbey . Taking previous work on Wilde’s identity from Dollimore (1991, p. 6), which delineates both a political Wilde and an aesthetic Wilde, Nesbitt identifies Downton Abbey as utilising the different “Wildes” in different situations creating “structural distance between the two references” (2017, p. 254).…”
Section: Scalar Memory Landscape and Biographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, while studies focusing on the spatiality and discourses of material landscapes innumerably address the individual, few works connect the individual – the embodied scale of biography – with the spectral or absent, especially in terms of memory work and the production of (national) identities. Nesbitt (2017), for instance, initiates a necessary discussion on the absent presences of individuals’ multiple and complex identities in the context of the nation by drawing from queer theory to deconstruct the memorialisation and absence of Oscar Wilde and Virginia Woolf in Downton Abbey . Taking previous work on Wilde’s identity from Dollimore (1991, p. 6), which delineates both a political Wilde and an aesthetic Wilde, Nesbitt identifies Downton Abbey as utilising the different “Wildes” in different situations creating “structural distance between the two references” (2017, p. 254).…”
Section: Scalar Memory Landscape and Biographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesbitt (2017), for instance, initiates a necessary discussion on the absent presences of individuals’ multiple and complex identities in the context of the nation by drawing from queer theory to deconstruct the memorialisation and absence of Oscar Wilde and Virginia Woolf in Downton Abbey . Taking previous work on Wilde’s identity from Dollimore (1991, p. 6), which delineates both a political Wilde and an aesthetic Wilde, Nesbitt identifies Downton Abbey as utilising the different “Wildes” in different situations creating “structural distance between the two references” (2017, p. 254). By doing so, the absent presence of Oscar Wilde disempowers his engagement with historical themes, given the historic context, that Wilde’s political and aesthetic identities could more powerfully address.…”
Section: Scalar Memory Landscape and Biographymentioning
confidence: 99%