2006
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299591.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Absent-Minded Imperialists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Bernard Porter has contended, historians must avoid merely stacking up examples of imperial ephemera over a long period of time and different locations and thence making sparsely evidenced assumptions that imperialism was rife or that a diverse population, differentiated by class, gender, religion, experiences and interests, necessarily absorbed imperialistic opinions from the assorted material it was exposed to. These cautionary arguments, like Porter's stress on contextual factors, 9 have influenced historians like Andrew Thompson and Simon Potter to realise the huge difficulties in assessing exactly how empire was received and perceived. Nevertheless, Thompson in particular has amassed compelling evidence of multifarious subtle and complex imperial (although not necessarily imperialistic), influences in the nineteenth century, operating in different ways on all levels of society.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Bernard Porter has contended, historians must avoid merely stacking up examples of imperial ephemera over a long period of time and different locations and thence making sparsely evidenced assumptions that imperialism was rife or that a diverse population, differentiated by class, gender, religion, experiences and interests, necessarily absorbed imperialistic opinions from the assorted material it was exposed to. These cautionary arguments, like Porter's stress on contextual factors, 9 have influenced historians like Andrew Thompson and Simon Potter to realise the huge difficulties in assessing exactly how empire was received and perceived. Nevertheless, Thompson in particular has amassed compelling evidence of multifarious subtle and complex imperial (although not necessarily imperialistic), influences in the nineteenth century, operating in different ways on all levels of society.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Rather than provide another critique of these theories -as has been done elsewhere 16 -this paper proposes to remind readers of a solid model of empire that is infrequently cited, but of real use when analysing specific local examples of imperial expansion and consolidation. John Darwin's notion of 'imperial bridgeheads', originally published in The English Historical Review in 1997 17 , proposes that descriptions of British imperial expansion should acknowledge the "pluralism of British society"; the "diversity of British interests at work in the periphery"; and pay "careful attention to the international constraints which shaped mid-as well as late Victorian expansion": As Gallagher and Robinson rightly insisted, it was the energy of private British interests -settler, commercial, missionary amongst others -which supplied much of the dynamic behind Victorian expansion (617).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Latterly, Bernard Porter has also identified what he calls the 'prefects' as the group for whom empire had the most significance and who were most committed to its survival. 5 All these historians have taken something from the toolbox of those who might be called the 'classical' theorists of imperialism who flourished in Europe and America in the first part of the twentieth century. Cain and Hopkins' work is the most closely identified with classical writings including those of Joseph Schumpeter, J.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%