2002
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.120.10.1331
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The Absence of So-called Compensatory Ocular Countertorsion

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
24
7
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
1
0

Year Published

Range
2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
29
1
1

Relationship

2
29

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 31 publications

(32 citation statements)
references

References 43 publications

1
30
1
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Jampel feels that the main purpose of torsional movements is to "protect the retinas by dampening [sic] the effect of the head movement on this sensitive tissue." 32 To this degree, he is in agreement with most other investigators. However, the main area of disagreement relates to the issue of there being any final static countertorsion.…”
Section: Other Theories
supporting
confidence: 79%