2019
DOI: 10.1177/0038026119854259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The abject and the vulnerable: the twain shall meet: Reflections on disability in the moral economy

Abstract: The meaning of impairment is often Janus-faced. On the one hand, it is associated with defect, deformity, monstrosity and other tropes that carry the weight of ontological ruin, haunting narratives of physical, mental or sensory catastrophe that disturb the normate sense of being human. Impairment is invested with the debilitating social and moral consequences that symbolise disability. Disavowed and repudiated by the non-disabled community, disability represents the murky, shadow side of existence that separa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These narratives do not necessarily locate hate crime within broader structures of violence that are present at all stages of the life course for people with learning disabilities (Chakraborti & Garland, 2012, refer also to Chakraborti, 2015). Further, they ignore the histories of exclusion from communities that have located people with learning disabilities as “good to mistreat” (Hughes, 2019).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These narratives do not necessarily locate hate crime within broader structures of violence that are present at all stages of the life course for people with learning disabilities (Chakraborti & Garland, 2012, refer also to Chakraborti, 2015). Further, they ignore the histories of exclusion from communities that have located people with learning disabilities as “good to mistreat” (Hughes, 2019).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In so doing, I highlight not only the enduring value of classic social theory for making sense of contemporary arrangements, but also how uniting these with a focus on materiality in healthcare/social care contexts provides the foundations for understanding how marginalised groups (older people, in this case) are denied agency, respect and dignity in their everyday lives. I conclude by highlighting how the (mis)treatment of older people is a story of both a deeply inequitable market for care provision (Johnson, 2018, 2022, in press), and a broader context of oppression, devaluation and dehumanisation (Hughes, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For, with this dismantling of collectivity and withdrawal of the state, comes ‘greater expectations for former service users to take up valued lives in the community and occupy positions in the open labour market’ (Power & Hall 2018, p. 305). This position is echoed more widely through a citizenship discourse fixated on economic self-sustainability as a route to increase social inclusion – a person’s value is now measured by their labour-power, which is inherently ableist (Hughes, 2019), and the desire to work is ‘nourished by neoliberal-ableism’ (Bates et al, 2017, p. 163). Moreover, with limited exceptions (Bates et al, 2017; Hall, 2004; Ineson, 2015), there is limited sociological engagement and an absence of questioning the normative assumptions associated with employment for people with intellectual disabilities and, arguably more important, a lack of engagement with the nuanced and complex perspectives provided by the people with intellectual disabilities themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%