2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ability of gait kinematic parameters to predict falls in older adults with cognitive impairments living in long term institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gait disturbance also can be re ected under dual task condition when performing naming animals test. The greater variability of stride length in MCI were also reported in other studies [20,21]. Moreover, our study identi ed that in dual task mode, swing time, in paralleled with the percent of terminal swing phase in a gait cycle greatly reduced in cognitively impaired individuals compared to normal aging people.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This gait disturbance also can be re ected under dual task condition when performing naming animals test. The greater variability of stride length in MCI were also reported in other studies [20,21]. Moreover, our study identi ed that in dual task mode, swing time, in paralleled with the percent of terminal swing phase in a gait cycle greatly reduced in cognitively impaired individuals compared to normal aging people.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This gait disturbance also can be reflected under dual task condition when performing naming animals test. The greater variability of stride length in MCI were also reported in other studies [ 42 , 43 ]. Moreover, our study identified that in dual task mode, temporal gait parameters swing time, in paralleled with the percent of terminal swing phase in a gait cycle greatly reduced in cognitively impaired individuals compared to normal aging people.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The mean speed, step length, and step duration matched the expected values for all cases (compare Tables 1 and 2 for an example). The step duration standard deviations were mostly on the order of 0.001 to 0.01 s. This is somewhat lower than is typically reported for human subjects (order 0.01 to 0.1 s) [25,[40][41][42] but somewhat higher than in another simulation study (order 0.001 s) [24]. This study's step length standard deviation (order 10 −10 m) was much lower than in human experiments (order 10 −2 m) [40,42].…”
Section: Comparison To Human Gait Parameter Valuesmentioning
confidence: 61%