1973
DOI: 10.1084/jem.138.6.1481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ability of Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide to Modulate the Induction of Unresponsiveness to a State of Immunity

Abstract: There exists a body of evidence which details that the antibody response to a number of different antigens requires the cooperation between thymus-derived lymphocytes (T cells) and bone marrow-derived lymphocytes (B cells) in a reaction whose net effect is the production of specific antibody by B cells (1). Both of these lymphocyte classes can be made specifically unresponsive to a given antigen (2), although each specific population displays a distinct kinetic pattern in the induction and maintenance of unres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
45
1

Year Published

1974
1974
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, analysis of a larger number of mice may reveal recombinants between these two LPS properties. Nonetheless, it should be stressed that a normal complement of antigen-specific T cells is not necessary for the effect of LPS on HGG tolerance, since LPS appears to have no influence on the induction of tolerance to HGG in specific T cells (1,6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, analysis of a larger number of mice may reveal recombinants between these two LPS properties. Nonetheless, it should be stressed that a normal complement of antigen-specific T cells is not necessary for the effect of LPS on HGG tolerance, since LPS appears to have no influence on the induction of tolerance to HGG in specific T cells (1,6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the mechanism is likely to differ in the case of thymus-dependent and thymus-independent antigens since the latter substances in fact nonspecifically abrogate B-cell tolerance induction by the former (7,8). Questions particularly suited to an in vitro analysis of tolerance induction in splenic B cells concern the proposal of Diener and Feldmann (9) that a multivalent presentation of antigen is an obligatory requirement for tolerance induction in the B cell, and also the kinetics of tolerance induction in a defined pool of B cells that is not being altered by the B-cell neogenesis that occurs in the bone marrow (10) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enhancing effect (adjuvant effect) of LPS has been thought to be caused by direct activation of B cells by LPS; LPS induces DNA synthesis (15) and polyclonal antibody production by B cells (15,17), and it enhances specific antibody response in circumstances where effects of helper T cells are absent or limited (16,20,28). LPS also prevents induction of immunological tolerance in B cells (12). On the basis of these effects of LPS on B cell responses, some investigators (12,28) have postulated that LPS acts directly on B cells as a second signal in the framework of a two-signal model of immunity (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LPS also prevents induction of immunological tolerance in B cells (12). On the basis of these effects of LPS on B cell responses, some investigators (12,28) have postulated that LPS acts directly on B cells as a second signal in the framework of a two-signal model of immunity (2). However, this interpretation should be reconsidered in view of reports showing that T cells or macrophages are involved as essential cellular elements in the adjuvant effect of LPS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%