The Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire May be the Preferred Method of Rationing Patients for Varicose Vein Surgery

Abstract

Rationing treatment of varicose veins (VVs) is of importance in countries with a public health service and limited funds. This study examines why and how the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) can be used in achieving rationing. Baseline assessments prior to endovenous treatment included the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), venous filling index (VFI), and the refluxing great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter. Absolute change in the AVVQ defined improvement. There was no significant correlation in AVVQ improvement compared to baseline VCSS, VFI, GSV diameter or when patients were divided into mild and severe disease (C2,3 vs C4-6) or laser ablation versus foam sclerotherapy. However, AVVQ improvement significantly correlated at 3 weeks (n = 84) and 3 months (n = 70) with their baseline values (r = .5 and r = .585), P < .0005 (Spearman). In conclusion, patients with an initial poor quality of life may benefit most from endovenous treatment, irrespective of other baseline severity assessments.

Hereditary angioedema: health-related quality of life in Canadian patients as measured by the SF-36

“…Several questionnaires have been developed to evaluate health related quality of life and help establish resource allocation [12]. The standardized SF-36v2 questionnaire can be a useful tool in the assessment of quality of life in patients with HAE, which allows comparison to other diseases, however a need exists for disease-specific surveys, to serve as a more precise indicator of disease burden.…”

Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in patients with varicose veins

“…The majority of the studies were of a small to moderate size with the number of patients ranging from 40 to 1700. Patients aged between 16 and 86 years were recruited in the included studies, with the proportion of men ranging from 24 per cent to 48 per cent.…”

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for severe chronic venous insufficiency

“…Evolution of disease is best assessed when multiple instruments are used, avoiding systematic errors of single question forms [37][38][39] . Anatomic and functional evaluation of venous system must be made by Doppler ultrasound (DUS), the ideal method, since is reproducible and non-invasive, allowing the access to venous patency or occlusion, identification and quantification of venous reflux, measure of caliber of veins and differentiation of primary and secondary venous disease [40][41][42] .…”