2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ABCs of Covid-19 prevention in Malawi: Authority, benefits, and costs of compliance

Abstract: Highlights The type of authority ordering precautionary measures affects compliance. Citizens are more likely to comply with costly measures when health risks are high. Citizens are more likely to comply with authorities they view as having expertise. Policymakers should provide expert-backed advice to increase compliance. Policymakers should take measures to make compliance less costly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(20 reference statements)
5
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the experience of the United States, another country with a competitive election in 2020, has shown, the presence of distrust and lack of support for Covid-19 prevention measures shared by significant fractions of the population can be an impediment to an effective pandemic response (Ciancio et al 2020;Soveri et al 2020). Trust is related to cultural values, norms and beliefs that in Malawi are represented by the authority of the village heads (OECD 2013;Quinn et al 2013) and prior research in SSA has shown that local authorities are often seen as more trustful than national institutions and leaders (Kao et al 2021;Vinck et al 2019). This is consistent with our findings that local sources of information (coming from local health personnel, traditional healers, community leaders and/or religious leaders) are more important to implementing social distancing measures than national sources such as newspapers, radio, TV, etc (Supplemental Table S11).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As the experience of the United States, another country with a competitive election in 2020, has shown, the presence of distrust and lack of support for Covid-19 prevention measures shared by significant fractions of the population can be an impediment to an effective pandemic response (Ciancio et al 2020;Soveri et al 2020). Trust is related to cultural values, norms and beliefs that in Malawi are represented by the authority of the village heads (OECD 2013;Quinn et al 2013) and prior research in SSA has shown that local authorities are often seen as more trustful than national institutions and leaders (Kao et al 2021;Vinck et al 2019). This is consistent with our findings that local sources of information (coming from local health personnel, traditional healers, community leaders and/or religious leaders) are more important to implementing social distancing measures than national sources such as newspapers, radio, TV, etc (Supplemental Table S11).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their eminent roles in all village-related matters, including monitoring compliance with public health measures and their authority to sanction dissent behavior (Kao et al 2021), the MLSFH 2020 Covid-19 Phone Survey elicited information on the pandemic-related activities of respondents' village heads (VHs). In this analysis, we define a VH as "socially active" if he/she had instructed village residents to implement social distancing measures (cancel village meetings, keep distance from other people during activities outside of the household (i.e., when fetching water), stop public works or recreational activities on common playgrounds).…”
Section: Sample Characteristics and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the e↵ectiveness of information can depend upon other factors, including the costs of following the information (Kremer et al 2007), household bargaining power (Dupas 2011), a respondent's beliefs regarding their eventual likelihood of contracting the disease (Kerwin 2020 ), their life expectancy (Oster 2012), or who issues the directives (Kao et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%