2019
DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhz039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ABCDE of Big Data: Assessing Biases in Call-Detail Records for Development Estimates

Abstract: This article contributes to improving our understanding of biases in estimates of demographic indicators, in the developing world, based on Call Detail Records (CDRs). CDRs represent an important and largely untapped source of data for the developing world. However, they are not representative of the underlying population. We combine CDRs and census data for Senegal in 2013 to evaluate biases related to estimates of population density. We show that: (i) there are systematic relationships between cell-phone use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of data availability issues, we need to consider how nontraditional data can be leveraged to complement existing sources in order to improve estimates and predictions of migration indicators over time. Previous work has explored the use of data such as call detail records (Blumenstock 2012;Pestre et al 2020), air traffic data (Gabrielli et al 2019), tax file records (Engels and Healy 1981) and other sources like billing addresses or school enrollment (Foulkes and Newbold 2008) to estimate migration. Additionally, an increasingly large body of work has investigated the use of social media data, from websites such as Twitter (Zagheni et al 2014), Facebook (Zagheni et al 2017) and LinkedIn (State et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of data availability issues, we need to consider how nontraditional data can be leveraged to complement existing sources in order to improve estimates and predictions of migration indicators over time. Previous work has explored the use of data such as call detail records (Blumenstock 2012;Pestre et al 2020), air traffic data (Gabrielli et al 2019), tax file records (Engels and Healy 1981) and other sources like billing addresses or school enrollment (Foulkes and Newbold 2008) to estimate migration. Additionally, an increasingly large body of work has investigated the use of social media data, from websites such as Twitter (Zagheni et al 2014), Facebook (Zagheni et al 2017) and LinkedIn (State et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their use in research does not preclude those from low socioeconomic groups in the way that GPS data would, for instance. An individual’s home and work setting can be derived from CDR data, which is particularly valuable for countries where no integrated infrastructures exist for population census [ 74 ]. However, there are limitations that need to be taken into account in evaluating the use of CDRs in health research and in considering opportunities for their wider use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations inherent in the data (outlined earlier) need to be quantified and addressed for greater confidence in research findings. Encouragingly, there are reports that propose how bias in phone data can be addressed [ 74 ], but other issues remain. It would be useful to see a series of studies that have assessed the validity of CDRs in health research compared to other forms of geolocation data, for example, with Bluetooth data [ 92 ], photographic data [ 93 ], and flight data [ 94 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their use in research does not preclude those from low socio-economic groups in the way that GPS data would, for instance. This is also valuable for countries where there are no integrated infrastructures for population census [33]. However, there are limitations that need to be taken into account in evaluating the use of CDRs in human mobility research.…”
Section: Human Mobility Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%