Abstract:Objective: To develop and evaluate a shortened version of the Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, to be called the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, or APHAB.
Design:The Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (PHAB) is a 66-item self-assessment, disability-based inventory that can be used to document the outcome of a hearing aid fitting, to compare several fittings, or to evaluate the same fitting over time. Data from 128 completed PHABs were used to select items for the Abbreviated PHAB. AU subjects were elderl… Show more
“…Subjects had at least two weeks experience with each system in everyday life before evaluation using the ''Abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit'' (APHAB) (Cox and Alexander, 1995). This test is based on a questionnaire which requires subjects to rate how often they have problems in specific situations, such as ''Unexpected sounds, like a smoke detector or alarm bell are uncomfortable'' or ''When I am having a quiet conversation with a friend, I have difficulty understanding''.…”
People with sensorineural hearing impairment typically have more difficulty than normally hearing people in understanding speech in the presence of background sounds. This paper starts by quantifying the magnitude of the problem in various listening situations and with various types of background sound. It then considers some of the factors that contribute to this difficulty, including: reduced audibility; reduced frequency selectivity; loudness recruitment; and regions in the cochlea which have no surviving inner hair cells and/or neurones (dead regions). Methods of compensating for the effects of some of these factors are described and evaluated. Signal-processing methods to compensate for the effects of reduced frequency selectivity using the output of a single microphone have had only limited success, although methods using multiple microphones have worked well. Amplitude compression can compensate for some of the effects of loudness recruitment, allowing speech to be understood over a wide range of sound levels. The exact form of the compression (fast-acting versus slow-acting, single-channel versus multiple channel) does not seem to be critical, suggesting that the relative loudness of different components of speech, and dynamic aspects of loudness perception do not need to be restored to ''normal''.
“…Subjects had at least two weeks experience with each system in everyday life before evaluation using the ''Abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit'' (APHAB) (Cox and Alexander, 1995). This test is based on a questionnaire which requires subjects to rate how often they have problems in specific situations, such as ''Unexpected sounds, like a smoke detector or alarm bell are uncomfortable'' or ''When I am having a quiet conversation with a friend, I have difficulty understanding''.…”
People with sensorineural hearing impairment typically have more difficulty than normally hearing people in understanding speech in the presence of background sounds. This paper starts by quantifying the magnitude of the problem in various listening situations and with various types of background sound. It then considers some of the factors that contribute to this difficulty, including: reduced audibility; reduced frequency selectivity; loudness recruitment; and regions in the cochlea which have no surviving inner hair cells and/or neurones (dead regions). Methods of compensating for the effects of some of these factors are described and evaluated. Signal-processing methods to compensate for the effects of reduced frequency selectivity using the output of a single microphone have had only limited success, although methods using multiple microphones have worked well. Amplitude compression can compensate for some of the effects of loudness recruitment, allowing speech to be understood over a wide range of sound levels. The exact form of the compression (fast-acting versus slow-acting, single-channel versus multiple channel) does not seem to be critical, suggesting that the relative loudness of different components of speech, and dynamic aspects of loudness perception do not need to be restored to ''normal''.
“…No sentence or word list was repeated in a same session. The Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP) [20] and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) [21] were completed after each experimental phase to collect participants' perspectives on the benefits of each technology. Speech recognition data were first analyzed on an individual basis, using a visual analysis method [22,23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performances with FL HAs in activated and deactivated FL conditions were also compared to each other using a similar procedure ( Figure 1, panel C). Data from questionnaires were also analyzed individually, using published within-subject critical differences of the APHAB questionnaire [21] and GHABP's norms [25]. Then, data from all participants were grouped by technology.…”
“…This is obtained through the use of subjective questionnaires that look at handicap, disability, and satisfaction with hearing aids (44). The score tells the audiologist how much benefit the patient perceives from the hearing aids.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.