2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0130-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 70-gene prognosis-signature predicts disease outcome in breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive lymph nodes in an independent validation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
152
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
152
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The prognostic value of 70-gene profile has been validated in a range of series of patients [3][4][5][6]. These studies confirmed that the 70-gene signature accurately discriminates between patients at high risk of distant metastasis and death and patients with a favorable prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The prognostic value of 70-gene profile has been validated in a range of series of patients [3][4][5][6]. These studies confirmed that the 70-gene signature accurately discriminates between patients at high risk of distant metastasis and death and patients with a favorable prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Although axillary lymph node status is an important prognostic factor, 25 -30% of node-positive patients remain free of distant metastasis. Mook et al [16] have demonstrated that the 70-gene signature can predict disease outcome in breast cancer patients with 1 -3 positive lymph nodes. The conclusion was that MammaPrint accurately identifies patients with an excellent disease outcome in node-positive breast cancer, who may be safely spared adjuvant chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the whole patient population, 90% of patients were estrogen receptor (ER) positive and 69% of the study patients were progesterone receptor (PR) positive. The studies by van de Vijver et al [6], Bueno-deMesquita et al [14,16], Mook et al [17,18] …”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%