2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2022.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 6-minute stepper test and the sit-to-stand test predict complications after major pulmonary resection via minimally invasive surgery: a prospective inception cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a significant improvement in 5STS was found after the HBEP, indicating better lower limb functional strength. This is consistent with the findings of Coats et al (2013), who observed an improvement in hamstring strength following home-based exercise training [26] and is of clinical importance since poor preoperative performance in the sit-to-stand test increases the risk of complications after lung cancer resection [81].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, a significant improvement in 5STS was found after the HBEP, indicating better lower limb functional strength. This is consistent with the findings of Coats et al (2013), who observed an improvement in hamstring strength following home-based exercise training [26] and is of clinical importance since poor preoperative performance in the sit-to-stand test increases the risk of complications after lung cancer resection [81].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…After multivariable analysis no significant association between sarcopenia and increased time for the 4 m walking test or sit to stand test was found. This is surprising as both walking and sit to stand tests are often used to determine sarcopenia and physical frailty preoperatively 21,22 . Although the outcomes of these tests can be influenced by a multitude of factors in the postoperative period, further investigation is required to determine whether these tests are indeed a valid surrogate metric for objectively defined muscle mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 14 included studies, 12 studies reported that the American Thoracic Society guideline was used to perform the 6-min step test, and two studies did not report which recommendations were used during the test. 44,48 Although all studies reported that the test duration was 6 min, only five studies (36%) 37,38,40,46,47 reported the other two criteria in accordance with the test recommendations. Two studies (14%) 41,42 did not use a 20-cm step and 9 studies (64%) either did not allow upper limb support (five studies; 36%), 22,36,39,42,45,49 or did not provide information related to upper limb support (four studies; 28%).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen papers failed to meet the inclusion criteria (see Supplemental Material for a summary of the excluded papers), leaving 15 papers to be included. 22,27,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] Two papers 22,36 had the same sample and were, therefore, reported as a single study (Figure 3). Therefore, 14 studies were analyzed in this systematic review.…”
Section: Flow Of Trials Through the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation