2014
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 5-Year Cost-effectiveness of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Replacement

Abstract: 5.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contemporary studies have suggested that total disc arthroplasty can be cost-effective, primarily by decreasing the rate of secondary surgeries. [21][22][23][24][25] In this study, device-and surgery-related adverse events were lower in the SECURE-C group than in the ACDF group. In addition, the rate of secondary surgery at the treated index level was lower in the SECURE-C group than fusion, supporting trends reported in other studies comparing arthroplasty to ACDF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Contemporary studies have suggested that total disc arthroplasty can be cost-effective, primarily by decreasing the rate of secondary surgeries. [21][22][23][24][25] In this study, device-and surgery-related adverse events were lower in the SECURE-C group than in the ACDF group. In addition, the rate of secondary surgery at the treated index level was lower in the SECURE-C group than fusion, supporting trends reported in other studies comparing arthroplasty to ACDF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Several studies have compared the cost of single-level cervical TDR to ACDF. [33][34][35][36][37] Most of the studies found lower costs associated with TDR. A large-scale cost analysis of single-level TDR vs. ACDF has been conducted based on data collected from a Blue Health claims database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous studies have demonstrated reduced long-term costs after single-level CDR compared to single-level ACDF, only recently has cost data become available for two-level CDR procedures. 31 Ament et al 32 performed a series of cost analyses of the data from the FDA IDE study conducted by Davis et al 27 The authors demonstrated that two-level CDR was "dominant" compared to two-level ACDF at 5-year follow-up. The incremental costeffective ratio (ICER) for two-level CDR was -$165,103 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) from a societal perspective.…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently published long-term costs analyses support reduced costs in both single-level and two-level CDR compared to single-level and two-level fusion, respectively. 31,32 As previously mentioned, Ament Two-level cervical disc replacement industry-sponsored clinical trial. As such, there is the possibility of bias influencing both data collection and analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%