2003
DOI: 10.1504/ijnvo.2003.003517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 4W framework for B2B e-contracting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…From the opposite eSourcing domain a, complementary provider contractual sphere is projected to the external level. Since the respective contractual spheres in Figure 2 are isomorph, a consensus is given between the eSourcing parties, which is the prerequisite for a contract [54].…”
Section: Expressiveness Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the opposite eSourcing domain a, complementary provider contractual sphere is projected to the external level. Since the respective contractual spheres in Figure 2 are isomorph, a consensus is given between the eSourcing parties, which is the prerequisite for a contract [54].…”
Section: Expressiveness Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The architecture qualities are qualities that are important for the design of a ''good" e-contracting reference architecture. Initially, as an inspiration for the definition of non-functional qualities required in an e-contracting reference architecture, we used the list of non-functional qualities on information systems presented in Bass et al (2003) and existing publications on e-contracting (Angelov and Grefen, 2002, 2003b, 2004aGrefen et al, 2003;Griffel et al, 1998;Hoffner et al, 2001b;Merz et al, 1998). Based on our initial list of requirements, we defined a draft version of ERA.…”
Section: Required Qualities In a Reference Architecture For Econtractingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating the extent to which ERA provides functionalities for the support of the e-contracting concept serves as an additional indication for completeness of ERA. We analyzed ERA from the perspective of the ''4W e-contracting framework" (Angelov and Grefen, 2003b), which compared to other contracting frameworks (e.g., Greunz et al, 2000;Griffel et al, 1998) provides higher level of detail and covers a larger set of concepts (Angelov and Grefen, 2003b). To familiarize the reader with the ''4W econtracting framework", we provide a brief summary of it.…”
Section: Theoretical Evaluation Of Era For Completenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the effectiveness of the contracting process and to dynamically form VOs the need to develop forms of e-contracting has been identified. Several significant characteristics for the e-contracting process can be found in [1]. These proposals are however still limited by a number of factors which affect their practical implantation including: (i) Lack of common standards and ontologies, a situation difficult to overcome in a general "open universe" of enterprises; (ii) None of these proposals takes properly into account more subjective facets (soft computing issues) like trust, commitment, successful cooperation history, etc.…”
Section: Multi-agent Based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%