2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 3D non-LTE solar nitrogen abundance from atomic lines

Abstract: Nitrogen is an important element in various fields of stellar and Galactic astronomy, and the solar nitrogen abundance is crucial as a yardstick for comparing different objects in the cosmos. In order to obtain a precise and accurate value for this abundance, we carried out N i line formation calculations in a 3D radiative-hydrodynamic stagger model solar atmosphere, in full 3D non-local thermodynamic equilibrium (non-LTE), using a model atom that includes physically-motivated descriptions for the inelastic co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model atmospheres. As a default solar model atmosphere, we employed the same 3D hydrodynamic simulation of the solar surface convection computed with the Stagger code (Nordlund & Galsgaard 1995;Stein & Nordlund 1998;Magic et al 2013), as was done in our recent studies of 3D (Amarsi et al 2018a(Amarsi et al , 2019(Amarsi et al , 2020. This is an updated version of the Stagger solar model used in Asplund et al (2009), Scott et al (2015a,b), and Grevesse et al (2015), but the differences in photospheric structure are minor.…”
Section: General Considerations Of the Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model atmospheres. As a default solar model atmosphere, we employed the same 3D hydrodynamic simulation of the solar surface convection computed with the Stagger code (Nordlund & Galsgaard 1995;Stein & Nordlund 1998;Magic et al 2013), as was done in our recent studies of 3D (Amarsi et al 2018a(Amarsi et al , 2019(Amarsi et al , 2020. This is an updated version of the Stagger solar model used in Asplund et al (2009), Scott et al (2015a,b), and Grevesse et al (2015), but the differences in photospheric structure are minor.…”
Section: General Considerations Of the Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For O I, the 3D NLTE abundance corrections (with respect to 1D LTE) are also all negative: the 3D effect and the NLTE effect go in the same direction (Amarsi et al 2016a). For C I, however, the 3D NLTE abundance corrections can be positive: the 3D effect and the NLTE effect can go in opposite directions (Amarsi et al 2019a).…”
Section: D Nlte Abundancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collisions with H I were treated following AK(Amarsi et al 2019a;Kaulakys 1991), BVM19(Belyaev et al 2019), BBD10(Barklem et al 2010), BYB14(Belyaev et al 2014), BVY17, SH84(Zhang et al 2008), SYB20 (Sitnova et al 2020), YBK18 (Yakovleva et al 2018), YBK19 (Yakovleva et al 2019), BGE19 (Bergemann et al 2019), BV17 (Belyaev & Voronov 2017), BBS12 (Barklem et al 2012), BY17 (Belyaev & Yakovleva 2017), BY18 (Belyaev & Yakovleva 2018), and SH84 (0.1) (Steenbock & Holweger 1984) with a scaling factor of S H = 0.1. SH84 (0.0) (Steenbock & Holweger 1984) and with a scaling factor of S H = 0.0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, LTE is a reasonable approach to model the solar photosphere: it is well-known that a LTE radiative transfer modeling is able to reproduce well the solar spectrum (e.g., Holweger 1967;Kurucz 1991Kurucz , 2005. Nevertheless, even regarding the solar spectrum, an non-LTE approach is mandatory for the analysis of certain spectral lines, being particularly important for accurate determinations of chemical abundances (e.g., see Grevesse et al , 2012Amarsi et al 2020, and references 4.2. Overview on radiative transfer codes for hot stars therein).…”
Section: Elementary Concepts Of Radiative Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%