2015
DOI: 10.1071/aseg2015ab055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 3D joint inversion of MT and ZTEM data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the ZTEM and MT techniques share similarities in processing and inversion, there have been several previous studies of simultaneously inverting these data to obtain an improved resistivity model (Holtham 2012;Sasaki, Yi and Choi 2014;Wannamaker and Legault 2014;Sattel and Witherly 2015). As the ZTEM and MT techniques share similarities in processing and inversion, there have been several previous studies of simultaneously inverting these data to obtain an improved resistivity model (Holtham 2012;Sasaki, Yi and Choi 2014;Wannamaker and Legault 2014;Sattel and Witherly 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the ZTEM and MT techniques share similarities in processing and inversion, there have been several previous studies of simultaneously inverting these data to obtain an improved resistivity model (Holtham 2012;Sasaki, Yi and Choi 2014;Wannamaker and Legault 2014;Sattel and Witherly 2015). As the ZTEM and MT techniques share similarities in processing and inversion, there have been several previous studies of simultaneously inverting these data to obtain an improved resistivity model (Holtham 2012;Sasaki, Yi and Choi 2014;Wannamaker and Legault 2014;Sattel and Witherly 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper describes a case study of how MT impedance and ZTEM tipper data can be jointly used in mineral exploration. As the ZTEM and MT techniques share similarities in processing and inversion, there have been several previous studies of simultaneously inverting these data to obtain an improved resistivity model (Holtham 2012;Sasaki, Yi and Choi 2014;Wannamaker and Legault 2014;Sattel and Witherly 2015). ZTEM case studies have been published for several types of mineral deposits including porphyry Cu, massive sulphide, and unconformity uranium, and there is interest in incorporating additional geophysical information to further improve the ZTEM results (Kaminski et al 2010;Paré et al 2012;Orta et al 2013, Hübert et al 2016Legault et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%