2014
DOI: 10.1142/s1793042114500560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 3-adic eigencurve at the boundary of weight space

Abstract: This paper generalizes work of Buzzard and Kilford to the case p = 3, giving an explicit bound for the overconvergence of the quotient Eκ/V (Eκ) and using this bound to prove that the eigencurve is a union of countably many annuli over the boundary of weight space.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the tame level is trivial and p = 2, this conjecture was verified using an explicit computation by Buzzard and Kilford [BK05], extending the thesis work of M. Emerton [Em98]. More explicit computations for small p and small tame levels have appeared in [Ja04,Kil08,KM12,Ro14]. A partial result that is independent of the prime p and the tame level was proved by J. Zhang and the second and third authors [WXZ14 + ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…When the tame level is trivial and p = 2, this conjecture was verified using an explicit computation by Buzzard and Kilford [BK05], extending the thesis work of M. Emerton [Em98]. More explicit computations for small p and small tame levels have appeared in [Ja04,Kil08,KM12,Ro14]. A partial result that is independent of the prime p and the tame level was proved by J. Zhang and the second and third authors [WXZ14 + ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This then implies that over the boundary of weight space the eigencurve looks like a countable union of annuli. For p = 2, 3 and trivial tame level this was proven by Buzzard-Kilford and Roe in [BK05, Therem B], [Roe14,Theorem 1]. For more details on the precise conjectures and their implications, see [BG16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For higher slopes we get, using Proposition 3.11, that Theorem 3.10 then predicts that the slopes in S † z 2 χ (1) (scaled by 10) are given by the 55 arithmetic progressions with common difference 50 and starting terms: 0, 2, 3,4,5,5,6,7,8,10,10,11,12,13,14,14,15,16,17,19,19,20,21,22,23,23,24,25,27,28,28,29,30,31,32,32,33,35,36,37,37,38,39,40,41,41,43,44,45,46,46,47,48,49,50. Note that we've included in this list the contribution of the progression 10, 20, 30, .…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 91%