1967
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(67)90062-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2p final-state interaction in the reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Davies et al I-4] measured the angular distribution of the reaction 3He(3He,4He)2p at E~ab=25MeV and got a maximum cross section ~ 1 mb/sr at 0cm=40 ~ Ro-berts et al [7] measured the differential cross section for the same reaction at El, b= 32 MeV and got a maximum near 0cm=40 ~ with a magnitude of 7 mb/sr. Similar changes in the cross section magnitude from Elab=43.0MeV to 53.0MeV is also known from the experiment of Slobodrian et al [8]. The background subtraction uncertainty of the Q3D method, discussed above at length, could account for a sizeable part of the difference with respect to the results of [1] and [5].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Davies et al I-4] measured the angular distribution of the reaction 3He(3He,4He)2p at E~ab=25MeV and got a maximum cross section ~ 1 mb/sr at 0cm=40 ~ Ro-berts et al [7] measured the differential cross section for the same reaction at El, b= 32 MeV and got a maximum near 0cm=40 ~ with a magnitude of 7 mb/sr. Similar changes in the cross section magnitude from Elab=43.0MeV to 53.0MeV is also known from the experiment of Slobodrian et al [8]. The background subtraction uncertainty of the Q3D method, discussed above at length, could account for a sizeable part of the difference with respect to the results of [1] and [5].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%