2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07619.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XII. The spectroscopic catalogue and luminosity function

Abstract: We present the final catalogue of the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey (2QZ), based on Anglo‐Australian Telescope 2dF spectroscopic observations of 44 576 colour‐selected (ubJr) objects with 18.25 < bJ < 20.85 selected from automated plate measurement scans of UK Schmidt Telescope (UKST) photographic plates. The 2QZ comprises 23 338 quasi‐stellar objects (QSOs), 12 292 galactic stars (including 2071 white dwarfs) and 4558 compact narrow emission‐line galaxies. We obtained a reliable spectroscopic identification for 86 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

54
890
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 627 publications
(947 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(70 reference statements)
54
890
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(B3) The normalization of the AGN LF is determined by the ratio of the number of observed AGN to the number of AGN expected from the best-fitting model, Φ * M = N obs /N mod . Over the restricted redshift range we are probing (1.1 < z < 2.1), the redshift evolution in the AGN LF can be well approximated with a simple pure luminosity evolution (PLE) model (Croom et al 2004;Ross et al 2013). We follow Boyle et al (2000) by modelling the redshift evolution in the break of 1.6 <z <2.1 Figure B1.…”
Section: B1 the Agn Lfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(B3) The normalization of the AGN LF is determined by the ratio of the number of observed AGN to the number of AGN expected from the best-fitting model, Φ * M = N obs /N mod . Over the restricted redshift range we are probing (1.1 < z < 2.1), the redshift evolution in the AGN LF can be well approximated with a simple pure luminosity evolution (PLE) model (Croom et al 2004;Ross et al 2013). We follow Boyle et al (2000) by modelling the redshift evolution in the break of 1.6 <z <2.1 Figure B1.…”
Section: B1 the Agn Lfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where k1 = 1.39 and k2 = −0.29 for z 3 and k1 = 1.22 and k2 = −0.23 for z 3 (from Croom et al 2004, modified by Croton et al 2006). Quasars at higher redshift are fainter, and fainter quasars have larger flux uncertainties which translate into imprecision in measured colours.…”
Section: Division By Redshift and Luminositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lacy et al 2004;Treister et al 2004;Stern et al 2005;Hickox et al 2007Hickox et al , 2009Hickox et al , 2011Stern et al 2012;Hainline et al 2014;DiPompeo et al 2014b;Hickox et al 2014;Lacy et al 2015;DiPompeo et al 2015; that has historically been dominated by optically detected unobscured systems (e.g. Croom et al 2004Croom et al , 2005Richards et al 2006a,b;Myers et al 2007;Croom et al 2009;Ross et al 2009;Shen et al 2009;Bonoli et al 2009;Eftekharzadeh et al 2015). This has resulted in tension between the prevailing paradigms that attempt to explain the physical origin of observational quasar subclasses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%