2023
DOI: 10.3390/nu15020297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 26-Item Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26): Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure in Vegetarians and Vegans

Abstract: The eating disorder screener, Eating Attitudes Test (EAT), has been used widely; however, its usability in specific dietary groups such as vegetarians and vegans remain unknown. Considering the rising popularity of vegetarianism and veganism, the current study aimed to assess the psychometric properties and theoretical assumptions of the 26-item EAT in separate groups of vegetarians (n = 278), vegans (n = 580), and omnivores (n = 413). Confirmatory factor analysis of four models from previous literature reveal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This concern was supported by our results, which found poor factor loadings for items in the Bulimia and Food Preoccupation factors, likely due to our non-clinical sample. This aligns with recent studies that question the EAT-26’s applicability in non-clinical settings ( 48 , 49 ). Moreover, critics argue that the EAT-26 may be overly complex for use in general health surveys ( 50 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This concern was supported by our results, which found poor factor loadings for items in the Bulimia and Food Preoccupation factors, likely due to our non-clinical sample. This aligns with recent studies that question the EAT-26’s applicability in non-clinical settings ( 48 , 49 ). Moreover, critics argue that the EAT-26 may be overly complex for use in general health surveys ( 50 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The V-EDS was designed to be integrated into research and clinical settings to discriminate between fundamental factors driving increasing eating disorder pathology (e.g., restricting food to influence weight versus restricting food groups to follow a vegetarian or vegan diet). The V-EDS also attempts to overcome some limitations in the field as a quick, inexpensive, and efficient way to detect those who may need further evaluation [ 11 , 12 ]. The V-EDS supports a unidimensional factor structure with excellent internal consistency (α = 0.95–0.96) and convergent validity (0.87–0.88), and moderate discriminate validity (0.45–0.55) in separate samples of vegetarians and vegans [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of eating disorders can be achieved through clinician-led interviews, such as the widely used Eating Disorder Examination Interview (EDE; [ 17 ]), or self-report questionnaires which are most commonly employed as screening or assessment tools. However, literature to date examining the use of eating disorder tools in strict vegetarian and vegan populations is scarce and focuses largely on the employment of self-report questionnaires [ 11 , 18 ]. For example, Heiss, Boswell [ 19 ] were unable to support the original and alternate factor models of the gold-standard eating disorder tool, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q; [ 20 ]) in a sample of 318 vegans, and further validated in separate analyses of vegetarians and vegans [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%