2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-022-03154-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai Volcano Air-Wave Generated Tsunami

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5b). These observations are consistent with pressure simulation results (Amores et al, 2022;Gusman et al, 2022) and ionospheric signatures retrieved over New Zealand (Ajith et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022). In addition, when corrected for the travel time (see Fig.…”
Section: Ionospheric Signatures Of the Lamb Wavesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…5b). These observations are consistent with pressure simulation results (Amores et al, 2022;Gusman et al, 2022) and ionospheric signatures retrieved over New Zealand (Ajith et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022). In addition, when corrected for the travel time (see Fig.…”
Section: Ionospheric Signatures Of the Lamb Wavesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, it is noted that the arrival times of these larger waves are in line with classical tsunami travel time predictions (see, e.g. Gusman & Roger 2022). This suggests that an initial G -mode contribution at the volcano (which would represent, e.g.…”
Section: Additional Source Contributionssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Such a mechanism could be plausible considering complex tsunami wave patterns in the vicinity of Tonga volcano shortly after the eruption, as reported by Gusman and Roger (2022). This information on tsunami wavefront progression was the result of theoretical tsunami travel times (TTT) calculation, using ∼gh $\sqrt{gh}$ as basic tsunami propagation speed formula where g is gravitational acceleration and h is ocean depth (Gusman et al., 2022; Shokin et al., 1987). In addition, empirical observation records of actual tsunami arrival times from coastal tide‐gauge stations and Deep‐ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunami (DART) buoys were also incorporated to further calibrate the tsunami speed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Figure 4 shows direct comparison between TID propagation velocity profile in the “near‐field” region and the tsunami velocity profile around Tonga, in both polar plot and scatter plot formats. The “near‐field” TID velocity profile is the same as that in Figure 3j, whereas the tsunami velocity profile was based on extracted contour line from Gusman and Roger (2022) tsunami wavefront plot at t = +2 hr after the main eruption. The great circle distance of a point on the traced tsunami wavefront from Tonga divided by Δ t = 2 hr gave us the effective radial tsunami velocity at that specific bearing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation