2021
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggab440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2020Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake: a dextral event with large coseismic slip highlights a complex fault system in northwestern Croatia

Abstract: SUMMARY On 2020 December 29, the Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake hit the Kupa Valley region and set a record for the largest earthquake in northwestern (NW) Croatia. The coseismic surface displacements are well obtained on three pairs of interferometric synthetic aperture radar images from Sentinel-1 satellites. The interferograms exhibit coseismic ground deformation with a maximum line-of-sight displacement of 0.4 m. Based on the coseismic deformation field, we investigate both the fault geometry an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dip (82-90°), strike (130°), and rake (184.6° ± 1.6°) from our preferred and alternative models (Figure 4 and Figure S4 in Supporting Information S1) are close to published focal mechanism solutions (70-89, 128-134, and 167°-180°, respectively, Baize et al (2022)) and consistent with the long-term morphology of the PPKF and surface ruptures mapped on the field (Baize et al, 2022). Our preferred coseismic slip model (Figure 4) also share common characteristics with InSAR-based solutions outlining at shallow depths (<7 km) a highly steeping (76-84°SW) planar rupture, <6 km wide, with peak slip values reaching 3.5 m (Ganas et al, 2021;Xiong et al, 2022). Indeed, the GNSS-based models confirm a shallow rupture (<7 km) with strike-slip amounts of 4.88 ± 0.69 m (∼3.7 m for the preferred smoothed solution) and high dipping angles (82-90°SW).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dip (82-90°), strike (130°), and rake (184.6° ± 1.6°) from our preferred and alternative models (Figure 4 and Figure S4 in Supporting Information S1) are close to published focal mechanism solutions (70-89, 128-134, and 167°-180°, respectively, Baize et al (2022)) and consistent with the long-term morphology of the PPKF and surface ruptures mapped on the field (Baize et al, 2022). Our preferred coseismic slip model (Figure 4) also share common characteristics with InSAR-based solutions outlining at shallow depths (<7 km) a highly steeping (76-84°SW) planar rupture, <6 km wide, with peak slip values reaching 3.5 m (Ganas et al, 2021;Xiong et al, 2022). Indeed, the GNSS-based models confirm a shallow rupture (<7 km) with strike-slip amounts of 4.88 ± 0.69 m (∼3.7 m for the preferred smoothed solution) and high dipping angles (82-90°SW).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The fault is discretized into 2 km wide sub-faults defined by 15 independent nodes along-strike and 8 along-dip. We perform inversions with different dips of the fault ranging from purely vertical to 70°SW, in agreement with the available data (Baize et al, 2022;Xiong et al, 2022). We invert for the rake and slip amplitude at each node using the horizontal components of both continuous GNSS and civilian benchmark displacements.…”
Section: Model Parameterization and Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The application of the InSAR methods in computing of the line-of-sight displacement and modelling of the fault parameters by uniform slip inversion were performed by Ganas et al (2021) and Xiong et al (2022). The line-of-sight displacement was estimated at approximately 40 cm and inversion indicate a relatively small fault plane surface was activated, about 8 km × 5 km with a large mean slip of about 3 m without reaching the ground surface.…”
Section: Petrinja 2020 Series Of Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Croatian researchers compiled a comprehensive documentation on the effect of the Petrinja earthquakes and also described the dolines that were formed during this time [1,2]. All other investigations are of geomorphological nature [3], those concerned with remediation measures and priorities for immediate action [4], ground displacement using data from orbits of the Sentinel-1 mission action [5,6]; fault geometry and the coseismic slip distribution [7], earthquake and deformations [8,9]. To date, not a single investigation considered the effect of earthquakes on dropout doline development in the environs of Mečenčani and Borojevići such as the shape of the doline, the inclination of the bearing surface and the rate of doline formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%