2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11021-5_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2018 PIRM Challenge on Perceptual Image Super-Resolution

Abstract: This paper reports on the 2018 PIRM challenge on perceptual super-resolution (SR), held in conjunction with the Perceptual Image Restoration and Manipulation (PIRM) workshop at ECCV 2018. In contrast to previous SR challenges, our evaluation methodology jointly quantifies accuracy and perceptual quality, therefore enabling perceptualdriven methods to compete alongside algorithms that target PSNR maximization. Twenty-one participating teams introduced algorithms which well-improved upon the existing state-of-th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
318
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 408 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
318
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, it is comparable to the externally trained SR-GAN method [30], despite having been exposed to only a single image. Following [4], we compare these 5 methods in Table 3 on the BSD100 dataset [35] in terms of distortion (RMSE) and perceptual quality (NIQE [40]), which are two fundamentally conflicting requirements [5]. As can be seen, SinGAN excels in perceptual quality; its NIQE score is only slightly inferior to SRGAN, and its RMSE is slightly better.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it is comparable to the externally trained SR-GAN method [30], despite having been exposed to only a single image. Following [4], we compare these 5 methods in Table 3 on the BSD100 dataset [35] in terms of distortion (RMSE) and perceptual quality (NIQE [40]), which are two fundamentally conflicting requirements [5]. As can be seen, SinGAN excels in perceptual quality; its NIQE score is only slightly inferior to SRGAN, and its RMSE is slightly better.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the recently proposed CNN-based SR solutions [37,40] provide state-of-the-art quantitative results in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) when they optimize for reconstruction losses such as L1 or L2 in image space, the results are smooth without the fine details required for a good perceptual quality. This problem is more visible with the increase of the upscaling factor [22,5]. On top of that, the PSNR measure is unable to capture perceptually important differences between two images as it relies on the differences between pixel-level values at the same position [41,42,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On top of that, the PSNR measure is unable to capture perceptually important differences between two images as it relies on the differences between pixel-level values at the same position [41,42,15]. One way to introduce perceptually important features into the SR image is to use generative adversarial networks (GANs) [13,26,5]. These networks help to create realistic SR images that look like HR images, which are naturally sharper and contain fine details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blurry edges and over-smooth textures were shown in SR results while having a high PSNR value. Both Perceptual Index (PI) 25 and Natural Image Quality Evaluator (NIQE) 28 are brought up to evaluate SR results in terms of perceptual quality.In order to improve SR images visual quality, researchers have introduced different loss functions to optimize SR networks. In 2017, Ledge et al 17 presented a generative adversarial network (GAN) 8 composed of a generator and an image discriminator for SR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blurry edges and over-smooth textures were shown in SR results while having a high PSNR value. Both Perceptual Index (PI) 25 and Natural Image Quality Evaluator (NIQE) 28 are brought up to evaluate SR results in terms of perceptual quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%