2021
DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2018 Global Point Prevalence Survey of antimicrobial consumption and resistance in 47 Canadian hospitals: a cross-sectional survey

Abstract: A ntimicrobial resistance is a substantial threat to public health 1 and increases mortality, morbidity and health care costs. 2 Antimicrobial overuse and misuse accelerates the development of antimicrobial resistance. 1,3 A global response is warranted to ensure rational antimicrobial use (AMU), given that antimicrobial resistance is commutable between countries. In 2017, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Globally and in Australian hospitals, the main indications for antimicrobial prescriptions were pneumonia, SSTI and surgical prophylaxis [ 10 , 29 ]. In this study, surgical prophylaxis accounted for 12.2% of antibacterial usage, which was higher than that reported in Canadian hospitals (8.9%)[ 11 ] and in Switzerland (9.1%)[ 27 ], but more closely aligned with the average five year NAPS rates (13.4%) in Australia [ 26 , 28 , 30 – 32 ]. This hospital reported a lower rate of antibacterial prescribing for CAP (7.8%) than national NAPS (11.4%) and Canadian data (14.4%)[ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Globally and in Australian hospitals, the main indications for antimicrobial prescriptions were pneumonia, SSTI and surgical prophylaxis [ 10 , 29 ]. In this study, surgical prophylaxis accounted for 12.2% of antibacterial usage, which was higher than that reported in Canadian hospitals (8.9%)[ 11 ] and in Switzerland (9.1%)[ 27 ], but more closely aligned with the average five year NAPS rates (13.4%) in Australia [ 26 , 28 , 30 – 32 ]. This hospital reported a lower rate of antibacterial prescribing for CAP (7.8%) than national NAPS (11.4%) and Canadian data (14.4%)[ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In this study, surgical prophylaxis accounted for 12.2% of antibacterial usage, which was higher than that reported in Canadian hospitals (8.9%)[ 11 ] and in Switzerland (9.1%)[ 27 ], but more closely aligned with the average five year NAPS rates (13.4%) in Australia [ 26 , 28 , 30 – 32 ]. This hospital reported a lower rate of antibacterial prescribing for CAP (7.8%) than national NAPS (11.4%) and Canadian data (14.4%)[ 11 ]. Similarly, antibacterial use for the treatment of HAP in this hospital (4.0%) was lower than 9.1% reported in Canada [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations